How does monitoring set the stage for adaptive regulation or maladaptive behavior in collaborative learning?

被引：0
作者：
Márta Sobocinski
Sanna Järvelä
Jonna Malmberg
Muhterem Dindar
Antti Isosalo
Kai Noponen
机构：
[1] University of Oulu,Learning and Educational Technology Research Unit
[2] University of Oulu,Center for Machine Vision and Signal Analysis
来源：
Metacognition and Learning | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词：
Collaborative learning; Monitoring; Adaptation ; Socially shared regulation of learning; Heart rate;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In collaborative learning situations, monitoring is needed to maintain common progress toward shared goals. The present study aimed to analyze group-level monitoring events, as well as groups’ reactions to these events, to identify instances of adaptive regulation and maladaptive behavior. Three dimensions of monitoring events were qualitatively coded from video data: the monitoring target, valence, and phase, which provided insight into identifying critical moments during the collaborative process when regulation is needed. By looking at what kind of monitoring the groups engaged in, and how the groups progressed after the need for regulation arose, different types of adaptive regulation and maladaptive behavior were distinguished. In addition, group-level physiological state transitions in the heart rate were explored to see whether changes in regulation (adaptive regulation and maladaptive behavior) were reflected in the state transitions. Nine groups of three students each participated in a collaborative exam for an advanced high school physics course, during which video and heart rate data were collected. The results showed that on-track sequences were the most common, followed by adaptive sequences. The temporality of these sequences was examined, and four categories of group progress are described with case examples. A correlation analysis showed that physiological state transitions were positively correlated with on-track sequences. The opportunities and limitations of using three dimensions of monitoring and heart-rate based physiological state transitions to study adaptive regulation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码：99 / 127
页数：28
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [1] Ahonen L(2018)Biosignals reflect pair-dynamics in collaborative work: EDA and ECG study of pair-programming in a classroom environment Scientific Reports 8 1-16
  • [2] Cowley BU(2009)Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion Metacognition and Learning 4 87-95
  • [3] Hellas A(2015)Defining and measuring engagement and learning in science: Conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and analytical issues Educational Psychologist 50 84-94
  • [4] Puolamäki K(2019)Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges Computers in Human Behavior 96 207-210
  • [5] Azevedo R(2010)Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges Educational Psychologist 45 210-223
  • [6] Azevedo R(2017)Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate Metacognition and Learning 13 57-90
  • [7] Azevedo R(2003)When smart groups fail The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 307-359
  • [8] Gašević D(2015)Addressing complexities in self-regulated learning: A focus on contextual factors, contingencies, and dynamic relations Metacognition and Learning 10 1-13
  • [9] Azevedo R(2012)Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom Learning and Instruction 22 245-252
  • [10] Moos DC(2011)Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model Educational Psychologist 46 6-25
12345678910