The Bifactor Model of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI)

被引:0
作者
Hoi Kwan Ning
机构
[1] Nanyang Technological University,National Institute of Education
来源
Current Psychology | 2019年 / 38卷
关键词
Metacognition; Bifactor modeling; Confirmatory factor analysis; Measurement invariance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Few self-report measures actually exist that were designed to assess school-aged children’s metacognition. This study examined the factor structure and validity of the Junior Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (Jr. MAI; Sperling et al. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51–79, 2002) in a sample of primary school children from Singapore. A bifactor model which includes one general factor of metacognition and two uncorrelated knowledge and regulation of cognition group factors yielded the best fit to the data. The general factor of metacognition was found to have high internal consistency and accounted for a greater amount of variance than the two specific factors of knowledge and regulation of cognition. Multigroup analyses offered empirical evidence for the measurement invariance of the bifactor model across gender and ethnic groups. The criterion validity of the model was also demonstrated by significant predictive associations with measures of learning strategies and mathematics achievement. These results provided initial support for the validity and reliability of the Jr. MAI for use with children in the Asian setting. The implications of the findings for future metacognitive research and assessment among children are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 375
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Akaike H(1974)A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 716-723
[2]  
Annevirta T(2006)Developmental changes of metacognitive skill in elementary school students The Journal of Experimental Education 74 197-225
[3]  
Vaurus M(1992)Development of a cognitive-metacognitive framework for protocol analysis of mathematical problem solving in small groups Cognition and Instruction 9 137-175
[4]  
Artzt AF(1988)On the evaluation of structural equation models Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 76-94
[5]  
Armour-Thomas E(1989)Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader Educational Psychology Review 1 3-38
[6]  
Bagozzi RP(1990)Comparative fit indexes in structural models Psychological Bulletin 107 238-246
[7]  
Yi Y(1980)Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures Psychological Bulletin 88 588-606
[8]  
Baker L(2001)The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F British Journal of Educational Psychology 71 133-149
[9]  
Bentler PM(2000)A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education 84 486-506
[10]  
Bentler PM(1992)Alternative ways of assessing model fit Sociological Methods and Research 21 230-258