Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and AHA guidance for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults

被引：0
作者：
David J. Murphy
Munaib Din
Fadi G. Hage
Eliana Reyes
机构：
[1] King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust PET Centre,Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine
[2] The University of Alabama at Birmingham,Section of Cardiology
[3] Birmingham Veteran Affairs Medical Center,Nuclear Medicine Department
[4] Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust,undefined
来源：
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词：
Infection; image-guided application; multimodality;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Over recent years, new evidence has led a rethinking of the available guidance on the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis (IE). This review compares the most recently available guidance provided by the American Heart Association (AHA) IE Writing Committee, and the Task Force for the management of IE of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). This represents the sixth of a new series of comparative guidelines review published in the Journal.
引用
收藏
页码：303 / 308
页数：5
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Baddour LM(2015)American Heart Association Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Stroke Council. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Circulation 132 1435-1486
  • [2] Wilson WR(2015)ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Eur Heart J 36 3075-3128
  • [3] Bayer AS(2017)Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery and the 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on noncardiac surgery: Cardiovascular assessment and management J Nucl Cardiol 24 165-170
  • [4] Fowler VG(2017)Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for myocardial revascularization J Nucl Cardiol 24 1046-1053
  • [5] Tleyjeh IM(2017)Guidelines in review: Comparison between AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death J Nucl Cardiol 24 1902-1903
  • [6] Rybak MJ(2017)Guidelines in review: Comparison of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and the 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation J Nucl Cardiol 25 509-515
  • [7] Habib G(2018)Guidelines in review: Comparison of ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable coronary artery disease J Ncl Cardiol undefined undefined-undefined
  • [8] Lancellotti P(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Antunes MJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Bongiorni MG(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
1234