Can small groups avoid the tragedy of the commons?

被引:3
作者
Morano R.S. [1 ]
de Moraes E.A. [2 ]
Jacomossi R.R. [2 ]
机构
[1] UNIFESP-Federal University of São Paulo, Rua São Nicolau, 210-4o Andar, Diadema, 09913-030, São Paulo
[2] Centro Universitário FEI, Rua Tamandaré, 688-6º Andar, São Paulo, 01525-000, São Paulo
关键词
Agent-based simulation; Collective intelligence; Social institutions; Tragedy of the commons;
D O I
10.1007/s00146-017-0720-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this research, an agent-based simulation seeks to discuss the tragedy of the commons, collective intelligence and institutions developed by social groups. The concept of the tragedy of the commons states that you can always expect environmental degradation when many individuals freely exploit a scarce resource of common use. Hardin (Science 162:1243–1248, 1968) proposes two alternatives to deal with it: state or privatized administration. However, it is possible another alternative of self-coordination when the social groups are small. That is, the tragedy of the commons could be faced when the synergy within the group—collective intelligence—develops. The focus of this paper is to analyze small groups who promote their coordination to achieve collective goals, aimed at the preservation and perpetuation of scarce natural resources of common use. The results of this research show that the extreme exhaustion of the environment and consequent dissolution of the group that depends on it, is easily observed in many circumstances. However, in small groups, the self-coordination through the development of strong institutions may avoid an eventual tragic outcome of total environment degradation. Additionally, it has been found that social identity influences the behavior of the individuals, determining the social structures. © 2017, Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Agrawal A., Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: some concluding thoughts, Environ Sci Policy, 36, pp. 86-91, (2014)
  • [2] Akerlof G.A., Kranton R.E., Economics and identity, Q J Econ, 115, 3, pp. 715-753, (2000)
  • [3] Ashforth B.E., Mael F., Social identity theory and the organisation, Acad Manag Rev, 14, 1, pp. 20-39, (1989)
  • [4] Axelrod R.M., The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration, (1997)
  • [5] Azevedo A.I., Martins H.T., Drummond J.A.L., A dinâmica institucional de uso comunitário dos produtos nativos do cerrado no município de Japonvar (Minas Gerais), Sociedade e Estado, 24, 1, pp. 193-228, (2009)
  • [6] Berger P., Luckmann T., The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge, (1967)
  • [7] Bezlepkina I., Brouwer F., Reidsma P., Impact assessment of land use policies: introduction, Land Use Policy, 37, pp. 1-5, (2014)
  • [8] Blader S.L., Tyler T.R., Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra role behavior, J Appl Psychol, 94, 2, pp. 445-464, (2009)
  • [9] Brinton M., Victor N., The new institutionalism in sociology, (1998)
  • [10] Carley K.M., Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behaviour of humans, Comput Math Organ Theory, 15, pp. 47-59, (2009)