Tumor size is an unreliable predictor of prognosis in basal-like breast cancers and does not correlate closely with lymph node status

被引:0
作者
William D. Foulkes
Matthew J. Grainge
Emad A. Rakha
Andrew R. Green
Ian O. Ellis
机构
[1] McGill University,Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics
[2] University of Nottingham,Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Community Health Sciences
[3] University of Nottingham,School of Molecular Medical Sciences
[4] Nottingham Universities Hospital NHS Trust,Department of Histopathology
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009年 / 117卷
关键词
Basal-like breast cancer; HER2; Luminal A; Luminal B; Tumor size; Lymph node status; Survival; Breast cancer; Poisson distribution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Larger breast tumors tend to be associated with a greater number of axillary lymph nodes involved with metastatic tumor than are smaller tumors. This rule may not fully apply in BRCA1-related breast cancers. We hypothesized that the rule also might not apply in basal-like breast cancers (BLBC), and further, that disruption of this relationship would impact on prognosis. In 1,324 non-BLBC (87.1% of 1520 tumors), after adjustment for grade, a strongly positive correlation between increasing tumor size and increasing number of lymph nodes involved by tumor was observed (P for trend <.001). The correlation was much weaker in 196 BLBC (12.9%) (P for trend = 0.58). Similarly, a worsening breast cancer-specific survival with increasing tumor size was observed in non-BLBC (P for trend <.001) but not in BLBC (P for trend = 0.43). The “size-nodes” relationship in BLBC is distinct and is similar to that seen in BRCA1-related breast cancer, further suggesting biological similarities between these sub-types of breast cancer. Moreover, tumor size is not a strong indicator of prognosis in BLBC.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 204
页数:5
相关论文
共 127 条
  • [1] Singletary SE(2002)Revision of the American Joint Committee on cancer staging system for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 20 3628-3636
  • [2] Allred C(1989)Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24, 740 breast cancer cases Cancer 63 181-187
  • [3] Ashley P(2003)Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinoma Cancer 98 1569-1577
  • [4] Bassett LW(2007)Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence Clin Cancer Res 13 4429-4434
  • [5] Berry D(2008)Basal-like breast cancer defined by five biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple-negative phenotype Clin Cancer Res 14 1368-1376
  • [6] Bland KI(2006)Basal-like breast cancer and the BRCA1 phenotype Oncogene 25 5846-5853
  • [7] Carter CL(2000)Molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 406 747-752
  • [8] Allen C(2003)Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 10393-10398
  • [9] Henson DE(2001)Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 10869-10874
  • [10] Foulkes WD(2007)Use of immunohistochemical markers can refine prognosis in triple negative breast cancer BMC Cancer 7 134-671