Local environmental factors in walking distance at metro stations

被引:25
作者
Zacharias J. [1 ]
Zhao Q. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Architecture and Landscape, Peking University, No. 5, Yihe Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing
关键词
Accessibility; Environmental factors; Metro; Public transport;
D O I
10.1007/s12469-017-0174-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Walking distances to metro stations vary substantially across systems, lines and stations, but few studies have attempted to explain such variable performance. The present study examines commercial land use, intersection density, total road length, distance to the nearest metro station, theoretical catchment area and built form density (FAR) as factors to explain walking distance in a study of 14 metro stations with 43 exits in three cities. These factors explain 7.5% of the variance in walking distance, amounting to a 16% difference in territorial coverage of the station, based on Euclidean extrapolation. In addition, stations with higher levels of patronage tend to have longer walks. Walking distance can be partially explained by the presence of commerce, while intersection density is negatively related to walking distance, in contrast to some indications in the literature. Commercial land use and certain employment areas have a much higher rate of destinations than do residential areas overall. The planning standard for pedestrian catchment zones and FAR are not significant in walking distance, although both are heavily relied upon for planning metros. This study reveals that land use and urban design can be controlled to promote the local use of metro. © 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 106
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Loo B.P.Y., Chan T.H., West rail and modal hierarchy in Hong Kong: some preliminary findings. In: the 12th conference of the Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, Hong Kong, 8–10 December, (2007)
  • [22] Loutzenheiser D.R., Pedestrian access to transit: model of walk trips and their design and urban form determinants around bay area rapid transit stations, Transp Res Rec, 1604, pp. 40-49, (1997)
  • [23] Moniruzzaman M.D., Paez A., Accessibility to transit, by transit, and mode share: application of a logistic model with spatial filters, J Transp Geogr, 24, pp. 198-205, (2012)
  • [24] Morral J., Bloger D., The relationship between downtown parking supply and transit use, ITE J, 66, 2, pp. 32-36, (1996)
  • [25] O'Sullivan S., Morrall J., Walking distances to and from light-rail transit stations, Transp Res Rec, 1538, pp. 19-26, (1996)
  • [26] Ozgur O., Performance analysis of rail transit investments in Turkey: istanbul, Ankara, Izmir and Bursa, Transp Policy, 18, 1, pp. 147-155, (2011)
  • [27] Papa E., Bertolini L., Accessibility and transit-oriented development in European metropolitan areas, J Transp Geogr, 47, pp. 70-83, (2015)
  • [28] Rastogi R., Rao K.V., Defining transit accessibility with environmental inputs, Transp Res Part D Transp Environ, 8, pp. 383-396, (2003)
  • [29] Rodriguez D.A., Khattak A.J., Evenson K.R., Can new urbanism encourage physical activity? Comparing a new urbanist neighborhood with conventional suburbs, J Am Plan Assoc, 72, 1, pp. 43-54, (2007)
  • [30] Saelens B.E., Sallis J.F., Black J.B., Chen D., Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation, Am J Public Health, 93, 9, pp. 1552-1558, (2003)