Are open educational resources (OER) and practices (OEP) effective in improving learning achievement? A meta-analysis and research synthesis

被引:0
作者
Ahmed Tlili
Juan Garzón
Soheil Salha
Ronghuai Huang
Lin Xu
Daniel Burgos
Mouna Denden
Orna Farrell
Robert Farrow
Aras Bozkurt
Tel Amiel
Rory McGreal
Aída López-Serrano
David Wiley
机构
[1] Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University,Faculty of Engineering
[2] Universidad Católica de Oriente,Faculty of Educational Sciences and Teachers’ Training
[3] An-Najah National University,Research Institute for Innovation and Technology in Education (UNIR iTED)
[4] Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR),undefined
[5] Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France,undefined
[6] LAMIH,undefined
[7] CNRS,undefined
[8] UMR 8201,undefined
[9] INSA Hauts-de-France,undefined
[10] Dublin City University (DCU),undefined
[11] The Open University,undefined
[12] Anadolu University,undefined
[13] University of Brasília,undefined
[14] Athabasca University,undefined
[15] Lumen Learning and Brigham Young University,undefined
来源
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education | / 20卷
关键词
Open educational resources; Open educational practices; Learning achievement; Meta-analysis; Meta-synthesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While several studies have investigated the various effects of open educational resources (OER) and open educational practices (OEP), few have focused on its connection to learning achievement. The related scientific literature is divided about the effects of OER and OEP with regards to their contribution to learning achievement. To address this tension, a meta-analysis and research synthesis of 25 studies (N = 119,840 participants) was conducted to quantitatively investigate the effects of OER and OEP on students’ learning achievement. The analysis included course subject, level of education, intervention duration, sample size, geographical distribution, and research design as moderating variables of the obtained effects. The findings revealed that OER and OEP have a significant yet negligible (g = 0.07, p < 0.001) effect. Additionally, the analysis found that the obtained effect can be moderated by several variables, including course subject, level of education and geographical distribution. The study findings can help various stakeholders (e.g., educators, instructional designers or policy makers) in understanding what might hinder OER and OEP effect on learning achievement, hence accommodating better learning outcomes and more effective interventions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 225 条
[1]  
Allen G(2015)Evaluating the effectiveness of the open-access ChemWiki resource as a replacement for traditional general chemistry textbooks Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16 939-948
[2]  
Guzman-Alvarez A(2020)Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2020 1-150
[3]  
Smith A(2020)Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36 126-111
[4]  
Gamage A(2010)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis Research Synthesis Methods 1 97-567
[5]  
Molinaro M(2022)Evaluation of statistical power in random effect meta analyses for correlation effect size Sakarya University Journal of Science 26 554-46
[6]  
Larsen DS(2009)A sas macro for statistical power calculations in metaanalysis Behavior Research Methods 41 35-270
[7]  
Bali M(2010)A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology Multivariate Behavioral Research 45 239-1789
[8]  
Cronin C(2022)A meta analysis of factors affecting teaching and student learning in higher education Front. Educ. 6 1769-292
[9]  
Jhangiani RS(2020)The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: A meta-analysis Educational Technology Research and Development 68 283-59
[10]  
Bedenlier S(2016)How methodological features of research studies affect effect sizes Educational Researcher 45 50-693