Bond strengths of brackets bonded to enamel surfaces conditioned with femtosecond and Er:YAG laser systems

被引:0
作者
Cahide Aglarci
Necla Demir
Sertac Aksakalli
Erhan Dilber
Ozlem Akinci Sozer
Hamdi Sukur Kilic
机构
[1] Sifa University,Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
[2] Selcuk University,Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics
[3] Bezmialem University,Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
[4] Mustafa Kemal University,Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics
[5] Selcuk University,Faculty of Science, Department of Physics
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Femtosecond laser; Er:Yag laser; Enamel surface conditioning; Shear bond strength; Enamel demineralization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare femtosecond and Er:YAG laser systems with regard to enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength. Human-extracted premolars were randomized to three groups (n = 17) depending on the conditioning treatment used for the buccal surfaces: 37 % orthophosphoric acid, Er:YAG laser etching (MSP mode 120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.2 W), and femtosecond laser etching (0.4 W, 800 nm, 90 fs/pulse, 1 kHz). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to the conditioned surfaces and light cured for 20 s. The samples were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5–55 °C) and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing using a universal testing machine. Failure types were analyzed under an optical stereomicroscope and SEM. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated to assess residual adhesive on the enamel surface. The results revealed no significant differences in SBS between the Er:YAG laser (7.2 ± 3.3 MPa) and acid etching groups (7.3 ± 2.7 MPa; p < 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the femtosecond laser etching group (3.3 ± 1.2 MPa) and the other two groups (p < 0.01). ARI scores were significantly different among the three groups. The results of our study suggest that laser conditioning with an Er:YAG system results in successful etching, similar to that obtained with acid. The sole use of a femtosecond laser system may not provide an adequate bond strength at the bracket–enamel interface.
引用
收藏
页码:1177 / 1183
页数:6
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Ramesh Kumar KR(2011)Depth of resin penetration into enamel with 3 types of enamel conditioning methods: a confocal microscopic study Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 140 479-485
[2]  
Shanta Sundari KK(1999)Combinations of etchants, composite resins, and bracket systems: an important choice in orthodontic bonding procedures Angle Orthod 69 267-275
[3]  
Venkatesan A(2013)Orthodontic bonding to acid- or laser-etched prebleached enamel Korean J Orthod 43 141-146
[4]  
Chandrasekar S(1955)A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces J Dent Res 34 849-853
[5]  
Urabe H(2005)Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional and a new integrated bonding system Angle Orthod 75 237-242
[6]  
Rossouw PE(2006)Acid resistance of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser-treated and phosphoric acid-etched enamels Angle Orthod 76 1052-1056
[7]  
Titley KC(1994)Helicobacter pylori and refractory duodenal ulcers: cross-over comparison of continued cimetidine with cimetidine plus antimicrobials Am J Gastroenterol 89 1505-1510
[8]  
Yamin C(2002)Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er, Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 122 649-656
[9]  
Ozdemir F(2014)In vitro analysis of femtosecond laser as an alternative to acid etching for achieving suitable bond strength of brackets to human enamel Lasers Med Sci 29 897-905
[10]  
Cakan U(2015)Ultrashort pulsed laser conditioning of human enamel: in vitro study of the influence of geometrical processing parameters on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets Lasers Med Sci 30 891-900