Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT): an instrument to assess unilateral chronic ankle instability

被引:0
作者
David Cruz-Díaz
Fidel Hita-Contreras
Rafael Lomas-Vega
M. C. Osuna-Pérez
Antonio Martínez-Amat
机构
[1] University of Jaén,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] University of Granada,Institute of Biopathology and Regenerative Medicine (IBIMER), Departmento de Anatomía y Embriología, Facultad de Medicina
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2013年 / 32卷
关键词
Ankle instability; CAIT; Cross-cultural adaptation; Spanish version;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a valid instrument to determine the presence of chronic ankle instability (CAI) and to assess its severity. Self-report test is very useful for researchers and clinical practice, and CAI is a widespread tool. Nevertheless, there is lack of measurement instruments validated into Spanish, which represents a major difficulty for research dealing with a Spanish-speaking population. The questionnaire was cross-culturally adapted into Spanish. The psychometric properties tested in the Spanish version of the CAIT were measured for internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, criterion validity, and responsiveness in 108 participants who were recruited from several fitness centers. The Spanish version of the CAIT had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.766) and reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.979, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.958–0.990). Correlation with the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical component summary score (rho = 0.241, p = 0.012) was greater than the SF-36 mental component summary score (rho = −0.162, p = 0.094). The construct validity shows three different factors in the questionnaire and good responsiveness with a mean change of −2.43 (95 % CI = −3.12 to 1.73, p < 0.0001) and a size effect of Cohen's d = 1.07. The Spanish version of the CAIT has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring chronic ankle instability and constitutes a useful instrument for the measurement of CAI in the clinical setting in Spain.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:7
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [21] Refshauge KM(2007)Loss of proprioception or motor control is not related to functional ankle instability: an observational study Aust J Physiother 53 193-557
  • [22] Bundy AC(2006)Effectiveness of exercise therapy and manual mobilisation in ankle sprain and functional instability: a systematic review Aust J Physiother 52 27-undefined
  • [23] Herbert RD(2005)An economical evaluation of a proprioceptive balance board training program for the prevention of ankle sprains in volleyball Br J Sports Med 39 111-undefined
  • [24] Kilbreath SL(2010)The Italian version of the lower extremity functional scale was reliable, valid, and responsive J Clin Epidemiol 63 550-undefined
  • [25] Docherty CL(2000)Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments Med Care 38 II84e90-undefined
  • [26] Gansneder BM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [27] Arnold BL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [28] Hurwitz SR(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [29] Pynsent PB(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [30] Guillemin F(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined