An analysis of prognostic factors in a cohort of low-grade gliomas and degree of consistency between RTOG and EORTC scores

被引:0
作者
Isaura Fernández Pérez
Diana Valverde
Concepción Fiaño Valverde
Jenifer Brea Iglesias
María José Villanueva Silva
Martín Lázaro Quintela
Bárbara Meléndez
机构
[1] University Hospital Complex of Vigo,Department of Medical Oncology
[2] University of Vigo,Rare Disease Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IISGS), Faculty of Biology
[3] University Hospital Complex of Vigo,Department of Pathology
[4] Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IISGS),Translational Oncology Research Group
[5] University Hospital of Toledo,Molecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to their rarity and heterogeneity and despite the introduction of molecular features in the current WHO classification, clinical criteria such as those from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) are still being used to make treatment decisions in low-grade gliomas (LGG). Patients with diffuse low-grade glioma treated at our institution between 2002 and 2018 were analyzed, retrieving and assessing the degree of consistency between the EORTC and RTOG criteria, as well as the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH) gene mutational status. Likewise, multivariate analyses were performed to ascertain the superiority of any of the factors over the others. One hundred and two patients were included. The degree of consistency between the RTOG and EORTC criteria was 71.6% (K = 0.426; p = 0.0001). Notably, 51.7% of those assigned to low risk by the EORTC were classified as high risk according to the RTOG classification. In multivariate analysis, only complete resection, age > 40 years, size and IDH mutation status were independently correlated with OS. When the RTOG and EORTC scores were entered into the model, only the EORTC model was independently associated with mortality. The degree of consistency between the EORT and RTOG criteria is low. Therefore, there is a need to integrate clinical-molecular scores to improve treatment decisions in LGG.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Morshed RA(2019)The management of low-grade gliomas in adults J. Neurosurg. Sci. 63 450-457
[2]  
Young JS(2007)Surgery Insight: The role of surgery in the management of low-grade gliomas Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 3 628-639
[3]  
Hervey-Jumper SL(2016)The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary Acta Neuropathol. (Berl). 131 803-820
[4]  
Berger MS(2016)Radiation plus Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine in low-grade glioma N. Engl. J. Med. 374 1344-1355
[5]  
Pouratian N(2005)Long-term efficacy of early versus delayed radiotherapy for low-grade astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma in adults: the EORTC 22845 randomised trial Lancet Lond. Engl. 366 985-990
[6]  
Asthagiri A(2015)Glioma groups based on 1p/19q, IDH, and TERT promoter mutations in tumors N. Engl. J. Med. 372 2499-2508
[7]  
Jagannathan J(2021)The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the central nervous system: A summary Neuro-Oncol. 23 1231-1251
[8]  
Shaffrey ME(2019)Concurrent versus sequential chemoradiation for low-grade gliomas meeting RTOG 9802 criteria Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 42 391-398
[9]  
Schiff D(2010)IDH1 or IDH2 mutations predict longer survival and response to temozolomide in low-grade gliomas Neurology 75 1560-1566
[10]  
Louis DN(2009)IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas N. Engl. J. Med. 360 765-773