Technology Adoption, Vertical Coordination in Value Chains, and FDI in Developing Countries: Panel Evidence from the Dairy Sector in India (Punjab)

被引:0
作者
Saule Burkitbayeva
Emma Janssen
Johan Swinnen
机构
[1] KU Leuven,LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, Department of Economics
[2] International Food Policy Research Institute,undefined
来源
Review of Industrial Organization | 2020年 / 57卷
关键词
Value chains; Technology adoption; FDI; Agriculture; Developing countries; India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
(Global) value chains have contributed to agricultural technology adoption in transition countries and food export commodities in developing countries through various forms of vertical coordination, often associated with FDI. Adoption of modern technologies in agriculture is crucial for improving the productivity and welfare of poor farmers. Much less is known about how (global) value chains do (not) affect technology transfer and/or adoption in staple food chains in developing countries, and the role that FDI plays. Our paper analyses the role of value chains and FDI in farm-level technology adoption with the use of panel data from representative farm surveys in 2008 and 2015 (a period of rapid growth) in the dairy sector in India (Punjab). We find important increases in the adoption of some technologies among traditional and poor dairy farms. However, the role of vertical coordination in value chains in stimulating technology adoption among these traditional dairy farmers seems to be minor, both for domestic and for FDI companies. At the same time a sub-sector of dynamic modern dairy farms has emerged. These farms are much larger, use only modern technology, and are fully integrated in vertically coordinated value chains that support these modern farms’ management and investments.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 479
页数:46
相关论文
共 133 条
  • [1] Bandiera O(2006)Social networks and technology adoption in Northern Mozambique The Economic Journal 116 869-902
  • [2] Rasul I(2014)Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program The Review of Economic Studies 81 572-607
  • [3] Banerjee AV(2012)Smallholder participation in contract farming: Comparative evidence from five countries World Development 40 715-730
  • [4] Duflo E(1989)Interlinked transactions in rural markets: An empirical study of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Punjab Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 51 73-83
  • [5] Barrett CB(2012)As you sow, so shall you reap: The welfare impacts of contract farming World Development 40 1418-1434
  • [6] Maren EB(2017)Formal versus informal: Efficiency, inclusiveness and financing of dairy value chains in Indian Punjab Journal of rural studies 54 288-303
  • [7] Bellemare MF(2005)Review on emerging trends in India’s livestock economy: Implications for development policy The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 75 1227-1232
  • [8] Michelson HC(2009)The economics of smallholder organic contract farming in tropical Africa World Development 37 1094-1104
  • [9] Narayanan S(1999)The importance of learning in the adoption of high-yielding variety seeds American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81 83-94
  • [10] Walker TF(1999)Emerging crisis in Punjab agriculture: Severity and options for future Economic and Political Weekly 34 A2-A10