Colorectal cancer screening education, prioritization, and self-perceived preparedness among primary care residents: Data from a national survey

被引:0
作者
Amy S. Oxentenko
Nisheeth K. Goel
Darrell S. Pardi
Robert A. Vierkant
Wesley O. Petersen
Joseph C. Kolars
Robert T. Flinchbaugh
Timothy O. Wilson
Katherine Sharpe
John H. Bond
Robert A. Smith
Bernard Levin
J. Bart Pope
Paul C. Schroy
Paul J. Limburg
机构
[1] Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
[2] American Cancer Society,undefined
[3] Veterans’ Administration Medical Center,undefined
[4] U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
[5] Louisiana State University,undefined
[6] the Boston Medical Center,undefined
来源
Journal of Cancer Education | 2007年 / 22卷
关键词
Fecal Occult Blood Test; Family Practice; Colorectal Cancer Screening; Flexible Sigmoidoscopy; Primary Care Resident;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the United States. We conducted a national survey of CRC screening education, prioritization, and self-perceived preparedness among resident physicians in Family Practice (FP), Internal Medicine (IM), and Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB/GYN) training programs.Methods. Directors/administrators from 1085 FP, IM, and OB/GYN training programs were contacted by e-mail with a request to forward an invitation to participate in our Web-based CRC screening education survey to all residents in their program. Willing residents submitted responses in anonymous fashion. Data were analyzed using χ2 tests and analysis of variance methods.Results. In total, 243 program directors/administrator signated specialty). Nearly all resident responders (89%) had received CRC screening education, but few content delivery methds were reported. Most felt at least somewhat comfortable or somewhat knowledgeable with respect to advising patients about CRC screening (90%), currently endorsed CRC screening guidelines (89%), and criteria used to identify familial CRC syndromes (50%). However, substantially fewer respondents reported feeling very comfortable or very knowledgeable in these areas (45%, 23%, and 5%, respectively). Program specialty, level of training, and gender were the strongest indicators of self-perceived preparedness.Conclusions. Although based on a relatively small sample of all FP, IM, and OB/GYN residents, these data suggest tangible opportunities to improve the CRC screening curriculum in primary care residency programs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Jemal A(2006)Cancer Statistics, 2006 CA Cancer J Clin 56 106-130
[2]  
Siegel R(2003)Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence Gastroenterology 124 544-560
[3]  
Ward E(2006)Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society Gastroenterology 130 1872-1885
[4]  
Winawer S(2006)Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Gastroenterology 130 1865-1871
[5]  
Fletcher R(2006)A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 55 308-311
[6]  
Rex D(2002)Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study Am J Gastroenterol 97 3186-3194
[7]  
Winawer SJ(2003)Colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: the importance of physician recommendation Prev Med. 37 627-634
[8]  
Zauber AG(2003)Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance practices by primary care physicians: results of a national survey J Natl Med Assoc 95 806-812
[9]  
Fletcher RH(2000)A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices Am J Gastroenterol 95 1551-1556
[10]  
Rex DK(2003)Medical residents’ colorectal cancer screening may be dependent on ambulatory care education Prev Med 36 352-362