Governance of Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Indian Government-owned Firms

被引:0
作者
Nava Subramaniam
Monika Kansal
Shekar Babu
机构
[1] RMIT University,College of Business, School of Accounting
[2] Central Queensland University,School of Business & Law, Higher Education Division
[3] Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham,School of Business, Amrita School of Business
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2017年 / 143卷
关键词
CSR; Qualitative research; Corporate social responsibility implementation; Logic of governance (LOG); Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs); India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study provides evidence on the governance of CSR policies and activities by Indian central government-owned companies [i.e. Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs)] within a unique mandatory regulatory setting. We utilise the multi-level ‘Logic of governance’ conceptual framework (Lynn et al. Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research, 2001; Lynn and Robichau, J Publ Policy 33:201–228, 2013) and draw upon interview data collected from 25 senior managers in 21 CPSEs to assess the dynamics of CSR implementation within CPSEs. Our findings indicate most managers believe that a mandatory policy has enhanced the accountability and commitment of governing boards and senior management to CSR. However, CSR policy implementation within Indian CPSEs is still nascent, fraught with bureaucratic hurdles, insufficient human and knowledge resources, limited stakeholder analysis and over-emphasis on CSR budget utilisation as an outcome. Several key areas for improvements include the need for better translation of national CSR policy goals to firm-level strategies, more formal assessment of stakeholder needs, clearer communication lines with external service providers, such as NGOs and local government agencies, and the better evaluation of CSR outcomes (i.e. the social impact of CSR activities). The findings of this study have implications for both theory and policy development.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 563
页数:20
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Afsharipour A(2011)Directors as trustees of the nation? India’s corporate governance and corporate social responsibility reform efforts fund Seattle University Law Review 34 995-1024
  • [2] Almquist R(2013)Public sector governance and accountability Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24 479-487
  • [3] Grossi G(2009)Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 22 1284-1307
  • [4] van Helden GJ(2011)Assessment of legal framework for corporate environmental behaviour and perceptions of residents in mining communities in Ghana Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 193-209
  • [5] Reichard C(2009)Beyond compliance—below expectations? CSR in the context of international development Business Ethics: A European Review 18 273-289
  • [6] Archel P(2005)Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting Business and Society 44 415-441
  • [7] Husillos J(2009)Facilitators and bottlenecks of corporate social responsibility Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 44 386-395
  • [8] Larrinaga C(2013)The paradox of corporate social responsibility standards Journal of Business Ethics 125 177-191
  • [9] Spence C(2007)Social disclosure: Up to where should the regulation go? International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry 1 18-28
  • [10] Armah FA(2007)The logic of governance in health care delivery: An analysis of the empirical literature Public Management Review 9 453-477