The Cardiocerebral Resuscitation protocol for treatment of out-of-hospital primary cardiac arrest

被引:0
作者
Gordon A Ewy
机构
[1] University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center,
[2] University of Arizona,undefined
来源
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | / 20卷
关键词
Ventricular fibrillation; Resuscitation; Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiocerebral resuscitation; Primary cardiac arrest; Emergency medical system; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a significant public health problem in most westernized industrialized nations. In spite of national and international guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, the overall survival of patients with OHCA was essentially unchanged for 30 years--from 1978 to 2008 at 7.6%. Perhaps a better indicator of Emergency Medical System (EMS) effectiveness in treating patients with OHCA is to focus on the subgroup that has a reasonable chance of survival, e.g., patients found to be in ventricular fibrillation (VF). But even in this subgroup, the average survival rate was 17.7% in the United States, unchanged between 1980 and 2003, and 21% in Europe, unchanged between 1980 and 2004. Prior to 2003, the survival of patients with OHCA, in VF in Tucson, Arizona was less than 9% in spite of incorporating previous guideline recommendations. An alternative (non-guidelines) approach to the therapy of patients with OHCA and a shockable rhythm, called Cardiocerebral Resuscitation, based on our extensive physiologic laboratory studies, was introduced in Tucson in 2003, in rural Wisconsin in 2004, and in selected EMS areas in the metropolitan Phoenix area in 2005. Survival of patients with OHCA due to VF treated with Cardiocerebral Resuscitation in rural Wisconsin increased to 38% and in 60 EMS systems in Arizona to 39%. In 2004, we began a statewide program to advocate chest compression-only CPR for bystanders of witnessed primary OHCA. Over the next five years, we found that survival of patients with a shockable rhythm was 17.7% in those treated with standard bystander CPR (mouth-to-mouth ventilations plus chest compression) compared to 33.7% for those who received bystander chest-compression-only CPR. This article on Cardiocerebral Resuscitation, by invitation following a presentation at the 2011 Danish Society Emergency Medical Conference, summarizes the results of therapy of patients with primary OHCA treated with Cardiocerebral Resuscitation, with requested emphasis on the EMS protocol.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 159 条
  • [1] Lloyd-Jones DM(2010)Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond Circulation 121 586-613
  • [2] Hong Y(2010)Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 3 63-81
  • [3] Labarthe D(1991)Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The Utstein style Resuscitation 22 1-26
  • [4] Sasson C(2004)Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States Resuscitation 63 17-24
  • [5] Rogers MA(2005)Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe Resuscitation 67 75-80
  • [6] Dahl J(2008)Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome JAMA 300 1423-1431
  • [7] Kellermann AL(2006)Cardiocerebral resuscitation should replace cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Curr Opin Crit Care 12 189-192
  • [8] Chamberlain D(2005)Cardiocerebral resuscitation: the new cardiopulmonary resuscitation Circulation 111 2134-2142
  • [9] Cummins RO(2005)An alternative approach to advancing resuscitation science Resuscitation 64 261-268
  • [10] Abramson N(2003)A new approach for out-of-hospital CPR: a bold step forward Resuscitation 58 271-272