The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement

被引:0
作者
V. J. M. Zeijen
A. A. Kroon
B. H. van den Born
P. J. Blankestijn
S. C. A. Meijvis
A. Nap
E. Lipsic
A. Elvan
J. Versmissen
R. J. van Geuns
M. Voskuil
P. A. L. Tonino
W. Spiering
J. Deinum
J. Daemen
机构
[1] Erasmus University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[2] Maastricht University Medical Center & Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht,Department of Internal Medicine
[3] Amsterdam University Medical Center,Department of Vascular Medicine
[4] University Medical Center Utrecht,Department of Nephrology and Hypertension
[5] Amsterdam University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[6] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Cardiology
[7] Isala Heart Center,Department of Cardiology
[8] Erasmus University Medical Center,Department of Internal Medicine
[9] Radboud University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[10] University Medical Center Utrecht,Department of Cardiology
[11] Catharina Hospital,Department of Cardiology
[12] University Medical Center Utrecht,Department of Vascular Medicine
[13] Radboud University Medical Center,Department of Internal Medicine
来源
Netherlands Heart Journal | 2023年 / 31卷
关键词
Netherlands; Consensus; Sympathectomy; Hypertension; Patient care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:8
相关论文
共 394 条
[1]  
Banegas JR(2011)Achievement of treatment goals for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice across Europe: the EURIKA study Eur Heart J 32 2143-2152
[2]  
Lopez-Garcia E(2016)Global disparities of hypertension prevalence and control: a systematic analysis of population-based studies from 90 countries Circulation 134 441-450
[3]  
Dallongeville J(2022)Adequacy of blood pressure control in high-risk hypertensive patients: the DEGREE study Int J Cardiol 352 137-143
[4]  
Guallar E(2004)Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study Lancet 364 937-952
[5]  
Halcox JP(2016)Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study Lancet 388 761-775
[6]  
Borghi C(2018)2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension Eur Heart J 39 3021-3104
[7]  
Mills KT(2014)Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. 1. Overview, meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials J Hypertens 32 2285-2295
[8]  
Bundy JD(2016)Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 387 957-967
[9]  
Kelly TN(2020)Intensive vs standard blood pressure control in adults 80 years or older: a secondary analysis of the systolic blood pressure intervention trial J Am Geriatr Soc 68 496-504
[10]  
Reed JE(2017)Nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis Medicine 96 e5641-306