Fifty Years of International Business Theory and Beyond

被引:0
作者
Alan M. Rugman
Alain Verbeke
Quyen T. K. Nguyen
机构
[1] University of Reading,Henley Business School, International Business and Strategy
[2] University of Calgary,McCaig Chair in Management, Haskayne School of Business
[3] University of Reading,Henley Business School, International Business and Strategy
来源
Management International Review | 2011年 / 51卷
关键词
Multinational enterprises (MNEs); Firm specific advantages (FSAs); Country specific advantages (CSAs); Compounded distance; Subsidiary; Network; Regions; Resource recombination barriers; Theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As the field of international business has matured, there have been shifts in the core unit of analysis. First, there was analysis at country level, using national statistics on trade and foreign direct investment (FDI). Next, the focus shifted to the multinational enterprise (MNE) and the parent’s firm specific advantages (FSAs). Eventually the MNE was analysed as a network and the subsidiary became a unit of analysis.We untangle the last fifty years of international business theory using a classification by these three units of analysis. This is the country-specific advantage (CSA) and firm-specific advantage (FSA) matrix. Will this integrative framework continue to be useful in the future? We demonstrate that this is likely as the CSA/FSA matrix permits integration of potentially useful alternative units of analysis, including the broad region of the triad.Looking forward, we develop a new framework, visualized in two matrices, to show how distance really matters and how FSAs function in international business. Key to this are the concepts of compounded distance and resource recombination barriers facing MNEs when operating across national borders.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 786
页数:31
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Andersson U.(2002)The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation Strategic Management Journal 23 979-996
[2]  
Forsgren M.(2007)Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: A business network view Journal of International Business Studies 38 802-818
[3]  
Holm U.(2009)Local, regional, or global? Quantifying MNE geographic scope Journal of International Business Studies 40 1192-1205
[4]  
Andersson U.(1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
[5]  
Forsgren M.(1996)How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost Journal of International Business Studies 27 467-496
[6]  
Holm U.(1997)Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives Strategic Management Journal 18 207-229
[7]  
Asmussen C. G.(2000)Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign owned subsidiary companies Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise 24 9-35
[8]  
Barney J. B.(1998)Unleash innovation in foreign subsidiaries Academy of Management Review 23 773-795
[9]  
Birkinshaw J. M.(2001)Building firm specific advantages in multinational corporation: The role of subsidiary initiative Harvard Business Review 79 131-137
[10]  
Birkinshaw J. M.(1998)Internalization thinking—From the multinational enterprise to the global factory Strategic Management Journal 19 221-241