Understanding risk factors and avoiding complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

被引:78
作者
Martin L. Freeman
机构
[1] Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415
关键词
Pancreatitis; Common Bile Duct Stone; Bile Duct Stone; Endoscopic Sphincterotomy; Oddi Dysfunction;
D O I
10.1007/s11894-003-0084-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Complications and technical failures of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cause significant morbidity and, occasionally, mortality. An understanding of patient- and procedure-related risks is important for decision making with regard to whether or how ERCP should be performed. Instances in which ERCP is the least clearly indicated are often the most likely to cause complications. Patient-related risk factors include suspected sphincter of Oddi (SO) dysfunction, female sex, normal serum bilirubin, or previous history of post-ERCP pancreatitis, with multiple risk factors conferring especially high risk. Technique-related risk factors include difficult cannulation, pancreatic contrast injection, balloon sphincter dilation, and precut sphincterotomy performed by endoscopists of varied experience. Pancreatic stents may reduce the risk of pancreatitis in a number of settings including SO dysfunction. Hemorrhage and perforation are rare and can be avoided with endoscopic technique and attention to the patient's coagulation status. Cholangitis is avoidable with adequate biliary drainage. Because success rates are higher and complication rates lower for endoscopists performing large volumes of ERCP, ERCP should be concentrated as much as possible among endoscopists with adequate experience. Patients with a high risk for complications may be best served by referral to an advanced center. Copyright © 2003 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 153
页数:8
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Cotton P.B., Lehman G., Venues J.A., Et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus, Gastrointest. Endosc., 37, pp. 383-391, (1991)
[2]  
Loperfido S., Angelini G., Benedetti G., Et al., Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study, Gastrointest. Endosc., 48, pp. 1-10, (1998)
[3]  
Gottlieb K., Sherman S., ERCP and endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis, Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am., 8, pp. 87-114, (1998)
[4]  
Newcomer M.K., Jowell P.S., Cotton P.B., Underestimation of adverse events following ERCP: A prospective 30 day follow-up study, Gastrointest. Endosc., 41, (1995)
[5]  
Sherman S., Ruffolo T.A., Hawes R.H., Lehman G.A., Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: A prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts, Gastroenterology, 101, pp. 1068-1075, (1991)
[6]  
Chen Y.K., Foliente R.L., Santoro M.J., Et al., Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: Increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 89, pp. 327-333, (1994)
[7]  
Sherman S., Lehman G.A., Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy, Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, pp. 201-210, (1990)
[8]  
Moreira V.F., Arribas R., Sanroman A.L., Choledocholithiasis in cirrhotic patients: Is endoscopic sphincterotomy the safest choice?, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 86, pp. 1006-1010, (1991)
[9]  
Boender J., Nix G.A., de Ridder M.A., Et al., Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: Factors influencing the complication rate, Endoscopy, 26, pp. 209-216, (1994)
[10]  
Freeman M.L., Nelson D.B., Sherman S., Et al., Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy, N. Engl. J. Med., 335, pp. 909-918, (1996)