Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics

被引:0
作者
Eve Fouilleux
Allison Loconto
机构
[1] Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS),UMR CEPEL (University of Montpellier) and UMR MOISA (Centre International de Recherche et de coopération Agronomique pour le Développement, CIRAD)
[2] Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA),Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Sciences, Innovations et Sociétés (UMR LISIS)
来源
Agriculture and Human Values | 2017年 / 34卷
关键词
Tripartite Standard Regime; Standards; Organic; Conventionalization; Certification; Accreditation; Regulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article analyzes the institutionalization of the global organic agriculture field and sheds new light on the conventionalization debate. The institutions that shape the field form a tripartite standards regime of governance (TSR) that links standard-setting, certification, and accreditation activities, in a layering of markets for services that are additional to (and inseparable from) the market for certified organic products. At each of the three poles of the TSR, i.e., for standard-setting, certification, and accreditation, we describe how the corresponding markets were constructed over time and the role of the different actors in their evolution. We analyze the politics at stake among the actors at each pole, their competing or cooperative interests and visions, and the tensions between them in the promotion of markets. Through the lens of the TSR heuristic, we show that the institutionalization of the organic field beginning in the 1990s and its de facto inclusion in the broader sustainability field beginning in the 2000s contribute to a progressive distancing between the organic movement and its initial political project of alterity, to which public and private actors both contribute actively. As a set of interlinked market institutions, the TSR orients and narrows the scope of debate, which becomes restricted to “market-compatible” dimensions and objects. We conclude that the TSR is a promising heuristic for analyzing contemporary global regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:13
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Abbott KW(2001)International “standards” and international governance Journal of European Public Policy 8 345-370
[2]  
Snidal D(2015)The transformation of organic regulation: The ambiguous effects of publicization Regulation and Governance 9 144-159
[3]  
Arcuri A(2007)Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions American Journal of Sociology 113 297-351
[4]  
Bartley T(2011)Transnational governance as the layering of rules: Intersections of public and private standards Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12 517-542
[5]  
Bartley T(2011)Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance Review of International Political Economy 18 17-51
[6]  
Bernstein S(2006)Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness: Standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling Organization 13 345-367
[7]  
Boström M(2007)Performing the economy, performing science: From neoclassical to supply chain models in the agrifood sector Economy and Society 36 437-466
[8]  
Busch L(2005)Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices Organization Studies 26 1229-1250
[9]  
Callon M(2011)“Kosher” in New York City, “halal” in Aquitaine: Challenging the relationship between neoliberalism and food auditing Agriculture and Human Values 28 67-79
[10]  
Muniesa F(2002)Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management European Journal of Development Research 14 11-297