Nicotine-related interpretation biases in cigarette smoking individuals

被引:0
作者
Alla Machulska
Marcella L. Woud
Julia Brailovskaia
Jürgen Margraf
Tim Klucken
机构
[1] University of Siegen,Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology
[2] Georg-August-University,Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, Faculty of Psychology
[3] Ruhr-University Bochum,Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Faculty of Psychology
[4] DZPG (German Center for Mental Health),undefined
[5] Partner Site Bochum/Marburg,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 14卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Addictive behaviors are characterized by information processing biases, including substance-related interpretation biases. In the field of cigarette smoking, such biases have not been investigated yet. The present study thus adopted an open-ended scenario approach to measure smoking-related interpretation biases. Individuals who smoke, those who ceased smoking, and those without a smoking history (total sample N = 177) were instructed to generate spontaneous continuations for ambiguous, open-ended scenarios that described either a smoking-related or neutral context. Overall, people who smoke generated more smoking-related continuations in response to smoking-relevant situations than non-smoking individuals or people who had stopped smoking, providing evidence for a smoking-related interpretation bias. When differentiating for situation type within smoking-relevant scenarios, smoking individuals produced more smoking-related continuations for positive/social and habit/addictive situations compared to negative/affective ones. Additionally, the tendency to interpret habit/addictive situations in a smoking-related manner was positively associated with cigarette consumption and levels of nicotine dependence. Exploratory analyses indicated that other substance-related continuations were correlated with their respective behavioral counterparts (e.g., the level of self-reported alcohol or caffeine consumption). The present study is the first to demonstrate smoking-related interpretation biases in relation to current cigarette smoking. Future studies should investigate the causal role of such biases in the initiation and/or maintainance of nicotine addiction and the merit of Interpretation-Bias-Modification training to support smoking cessation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 232 条
  • [11] Hine DW(2019)Implicit 'wanting' without implicit 'liking': A test of incentive-sensitization-theory in the context of smoking addiction using the wanting-implicit-association-test (W-IAT) J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 64 9-444
  • [12] Thorsteinsson EB(2016)Assessment of tobacco-related approach and attentional biases in smokers, cravers, people who stopped smoking, and non-smoking individuals Front. Psychol. 20 436-121
  • [13] Wiers RW(2006)Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions Psychol. Addict. Behav. 141 105-632
  • [14] Van Dessel P(2021)Approach bias retraining through virtual reality in smokers willing to quit smoking: A randomized-controlled study Behav. Res. Ther. 239 627-1159
  • [15] Köpetz C(2022)"Push it!" or "Hold it!"? A comparison of nicotine-avoidance training and nicotine-inhibition training in smokers motivated to quit Psychopharmacology 26 1151-498
  • [16] Ng M(2022)Same same, but different: A psychometric examination of three frequently used experimental tasks for cognitive bias assessment in a sample of healthy young adults Behav. Res. 38 489-73
  • [17] Freeman MK(2012)‘Getting into the spirit’: Alcohol-related interpretation bias in heavy drinking students Psychol. Addict. Behav. 24 61-281
  • [18] Fleming TD(2014)Alcohol-related interpretation bias in alcohol-dependent patients Alcohol.: Clin. Exp. Res. 106 272-68
  • [19] Robinson M(2005)Alcohol-related associative strength and drinking behaviors: Concurrent and prospective relationships Drug Alcohol Rev. 12 61-110
  • [20] Dwyer-Lindgren L(1997)Memory activation and expectancy as prospective predictors of alcohol and marijuana use J. Abnormal Psychol. 49 102-198