Effects of vasodilators on beat-to-beat and every fifteen minutes blood pressure variability induced by noradrenaline infusion in rats

被引:0
作者
Danfeng Jiang
Minami Matsuzaki
Takanori Ida
Kazuo Kitamura
Johji Kato
机构
[1] University of Miyazaki Faculty of Medicine,Frontier Science Research Center
来源
Hypertension Research | 2024年 / 47卷
关键词
Blood pressure variability; Noradrenaline; Azelnidipine; Hydralazine; Baroreceptor reflex sensitivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Increased blood pressure variability (BPV) was shown to be associated with cardiovascular morbidities and/or mortalities. There are various types of BPV depending on time intervals of BP measurements, ranging from beat-to-beat to visit-to-visit or year-to-year. We previously found that continuous infusion of noradrenaline (NA) for 14 days increased short-term BPV every 15 min in rats. The aims of this study were to examine (1) whether NA infusion increases very short-term beat-to-beat BPV, (2) the effects of azelnidipine and hydralazine on NA-induced BPV, and (3) whether baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (BRS) is affected by NA or NA plus those vasodilators. Nine-week-old Wistar rats infused subcutaneously with 30 μg/h NA were orally treated with or without 9.7 mg/day azelnidipine or 5.9 mg/day hydralazine over 14 days. BP levels were continuously monitored via abdominal aortic catheter with a telemetry system in an unrestrained condition. Standard deviations (SDs) were used to evaluate beat-to-beat BPV and BPV every 15 min which was obtained by averaging BP levels for 10-s segment at each time point. BRS was determined by a sequence analysis. Continuous NA infusion over 14 days increased average BP, beat-to-beat BPV, and BPV every 15 min, lowering BRS. Comparing the two vasodilators, hydralazine reduced BP elevation by NA; meanwhile, azelnidipine alleviated BPV augmentation, preserving BRS, despite a smaller BP reduction. Thus, NA infusion increased both very short- and short-term BPV concomitantly with impaired BRS, while azelnidipine had an inhibitory effect, possibly independent of BP-lowering, on those types of BPV and impairment of BRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1023
页数:6
相关论文
共 130 条
  • [1] Rothwell PM(2010)Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension Lancet 375 895-905
  • [2] Howard SC(2011)The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994 Hypertension 57 160-6
  • [3] Dolan E(2020)Blood pressure variability: its relevance for cardiovascular homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases Hypertens Res 43 609-20
  • [4] O’Brien E(2015)Prognosis in relation to blood pressure variability: pro side of the argument Hypertension 65 1163-9
  • [5] Dobson JE(2000)Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities: the Ohasama study Hypertension 36 901-6
  • [6] Dahlöf B(2012)Short- and long-term blood pressure variability: present and future Hypertension 60 512-7
  • [7] Muntner P(2010)Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke Lancet Neurol 9 469-80
  • [8] Shimbo D(2017)Treating visit-to-visit blood pressure variability to improve prognosis: Is amlodipine the drug of choice? Hypertension 70 862-6
  • [9] Tonelli M(2014)Efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine combination therapy in reducing ambulatory blood pressure in moderate-to-severe hypertensive patients not controlled by amlodipine alone Hypertens Res 37 836-44
  • [10] Reynolds K(2016)Comparison of valsartan and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients Clin Exp Hypertens 38 721-4