Health Literacy: An Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcome

被引:0
作者
H. Shonna Yin
Melanie Jay
Leslie Maness
Sondra Zabar
Adina Kalet
机构
[1] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics
[2] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Population Health
[3] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine
[4] New York University School of Medicine,Research on Medical Education Research Unit, Program on Medical Education Innovation and Research
[5] Veterans Affair New York Harbor,Department of Medicine
来源
Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2015年 / 30卷
关键词
medical education; health literacy; patient engagement; patient activation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We have previously proposed that by identifying a set of Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcomes (ESPOs), medical education outcomes research becomes more feasible and likely to provide meaningful guidance for medical education policy and practice. ESPOs are proximal outcomes that are sensitive to provider education, measurable, and linked to more distal health outcomes. Our previous model included Patient Activation and Clinical Microsystem Activation as ESPOs. In this paper, we discuss how Health Literacy, defined as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions,” is another important ESPO. Between one-third and one-half of all US adults have limited health literacy skills. Providers can be trained to adopt a “universal precautions approach” to addressing patient health literacy, through the acquisition of specific skills (e.g., teachback, “chunking” information, use of plain language written materials) and by learning how to take action to improve the “health literacy environment.” While there are several ways to measure health literacy, identifying which measurement tools are most sensitive to provider education is important, but challenging and complex. Further research is needed to test this model and identify additional ESPOs.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1368
页数:5
相关论文
共 211 条
  • [21] Palmer RF(2003)Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy Arch Intern Med 163 83-300
  • [22] Hibbard JH(2007)To err is human: Patient misinterpretations of prescription drug label instructions Patient Educ Couns 67 293-822
  • [23] Stockard J(2008)Randomized controlled trial of a pictogram-based intervention to reduce liquid medication dosing errors and improve adherence among caregivers of young children Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162 814-1716
  • [24] Mahoney ER(2004)Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care–based diabetes disease management program JAMA 292 1711-1041
  • [25] Tusler M(2002)Residents’ ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills Acad Med 77 1039-943
  • [26] Hibbard JH(2002)The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 938-122
  • [27] Greene J(2007)Physician overestimation of patient literacy: a potential source of health care disparities Patient Educ Couns 66 119-129
  • [28] Hibbard JH(2009)Cancer risk communication with low health literacy patients: a continuing medical education program J Gen Intern Med 25 126-890
  • [29] Greene J(2006)Teaching about health literacy and clear communication J Gen Intern Med 21 888-S114
  • [30] Overton V(2007)Teaching medical students about health literacy: 2 chicago initiatives Am J Health Behav 31 S111-S110