Health Literacy: An Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcome

被引:0
作者
H. Shonna Yin
Melanie Jay
Leslie Maness
Sondra Zabar
Adina Kalet
机构
[1] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics
[2] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Population Health
[3] New York University School of Medicine,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine
[4] New York University School of Medicine,Research on Medical Education Research Unit, Program on Medical Education Innovation and Research
[5] Veterans Affair New York Harbor,Department of Medicine
来源
Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2015年 / 30卷
关键词
medical education; health literacy; patient engagement; patient activation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We have previously proposed that by identifying a set of Educationally Sensitive Patient Outcomes (ESPOs), medical education outcomes research becomes more feasible and likely to provide meaningful guidance for medical education policy and practice. ESPOs are proximal outcomes that are sensitive to provider education, measurable, and linked to more distal health outcomes. Our previous model included Patient Activation and Clinical Microsystem Activation as ESPOs. In this paper, we discuss how Health Literacy, defined as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic health information and services needed to make appropriate health decisions,” is another important ESPO. Between one-third and one-half of all US adults have limited health literacy skills. Providers can be trained to adopt a “universal precautions approach” to addressing patient health literacy, through the acquisition of specific skills (e.g., teachback, “chunking” information, use of plain language written materials) and by learning how to take action to improve the “health literacy environment.” While there are several ways to measure health literacy, identifying which measurement tools are most sensitive to provider education is important, but challenging and complex. Further research is needed to test this model and identify additional ESPOs.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1368
页数:5
相关论文
共 211 条
  • [1] Asch DA(2014)How do you deliver a good obstetrician? Outcome-based evaluation of medical education Acad Med 89 24-26
  • [2] Nicholson S(2010)New measures to establish the evidence base for medical education: identifying educationally sensitive patient outcomes Acad Med 85 844-851
  • [3] Srinivas SK(2013)Perspective: reconsidering the focus on “outcomes research” in medical education: a cautionary note Acad Med 88 162-167
  • [4] Herrin J(2014)Innovation in medical education NEJM 371 794-795
  • [5] Epstein AJ(2007)Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manag 30 21-29
  • [6] Kalet AL(2010)Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a STARNet study Ann Fam Med 8 410-417
  • [7] Gillespie CC(2004)Development of the patient activation measure (pam): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers Health Serv Res 39 1005-1026
  • [8] Schwartz MD(2013)What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs Health Aff 32 207-214
  • [9] Cook DA(2013)Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients’ ’Scores’ Health Aff 32 216-222
  • [10] West CP(2011)Resident physicians’ patient activating skills are associated with obese patients’ weight loss J Gen Intern Med 26 285-557