Preperitoneal, minimally invasive, prosthetic groin hernia repair

被引:0
作者
Zotti G.C. [1 ]
Mancuso M. [1 ]
Giuliani A. [1 ]
Navarra S. [1 ]
Salvo G. [1 ]
Scalise E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of General Surgery, Medical School Hospital, University Federico II, Naples
关键词
Hernioplasty; Inguinal hernia; Mesh; Preperitoneal approach; Tension-free technique;
D O I
10.1007/BF01201093
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study describes the advantages of using the positioning of the prosthesis in the pre-peritoneal space by a posterior approach in the repair of inguinal hernia. The research was carried out on 388 patients (372 (96%) men and 16 (4%) women), who had undergone hernioplasties with the insertion of a polypropylene prosthesis by a preperitoneal approach, between January 1994 and December 1996. 216 of these patients (56%) had an indirect inguinal hernia, 94 (24%) a direct inguinal hernia and 78 (20%) a double inguinal hernia (direct and indirect). In 21 cases (6%) it was a recurrent hernia. The following clinical parameters were considered: pain, sensitivity of the inguinal region, testicular pathology, wound pathology and recurrence. 384 patients out of 388 (99%) were discharged at latest one day after the operation. On average the patients went back to work 6 days after the operation. All the patients were checked at least three times out of four, with follow-ups at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after the operation. In 13 patients (1.8%) there was a minor complication, in 3 patients (0.8%) we found an early recurrence due to technical error. We consider that positioning the prosthesis in the preperitoneal space using this minimally invasive procedure can be carried out easily and with very good clinical results in terms of typical early and/or late complications, which range from 2% to 20% by the anterior approach.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 320
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Incidence of postoperative complications in transabdominal preperitoneal repair for groin hernia is influenced by poor performance status rather than by old age
    Egawa, Noriyuki
    Nakamura, Jun
    Manabe, Tatsuya
    Iwasaki, Hironori
    Noshiro, Hirokazu
    [J]. ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2019, 3 (03): : 318 - 324
  • [32] Open preperitoneal mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia
    K. M. Katri
    [J]. Hernia, 2009, 13 : 585 - 589
  • [33] Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair for Obturator Hernia
    Takahide Yokoyama
    Akira Kobayashi
    Toshiki Kikuchi
    Ken Hayashi
    Shinichi Miyagawa
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 2323 - 2327
  • [34] Groin hernia repair in young males: mesh or sutured repair?
    Bisgaard, T.
    Bay-Nielsen, M.
    Kehlet, H.
    [J]. HERNIA, 2010, 14 (05) : 467 - 469
  • [35] Fifteen-year groin hernia trends in Australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeons
    Kevric, Jasmina
    Papa, Nathan
    Toshniwal, Sumeet
    Perera, Marlon
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (04) : E298 - E302
  • [36] Gender discrimination in endoscopic groin hernia repair. Minimal invasive groin hernia repair is offered less often to female patients compared to male patients
    Stodolski, M.
    Zirngibl, H.
    Ambe, P. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2020, 157 (04) : 271 - 276
  • [37] Comparison of mesh fixation and nonfixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia
    Kalidarei, Behrooz
    Mahmoodieh, Mohsen
    Sharbu, Zakaria
    [J]. FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 52 (06) : 212 - 220
  • [38] Ambulatory groin and ventral hernia repair
    Ngo, P.
    Pelissier, E.
    Levard, H.
    Perniceni, T.
    Denet, C.
    Gayet, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2010, 147 (05) : E325 - E328
  • [39] Recurrence after groin hernia repair-revisited
    Gopal, Vengadesh
    Warrier, Achuthan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (05) : 374 - 377
  • [40] Nationwide Prevalence of Groin Hernia Repair
    Burcharth, Jakob
    Pedersen, Michael
    Bisgaard, Thue
    Pedersen, Carsten
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):