Reading Processes and Parenting Styles

被引:0
作者
Rui Manuel Carreteiro
João Manuel Justo
Ana Paula Figueira
机构
[1] National Institute of Psychology and Neurosciences,Faculty of Psychology
[2] University of Lisbon,Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences
[3] University of Coimbra,undefined
来源
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2016年 / 45卷
关键词
Reading; Parenting styles; Children; Dyslexia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Home literacy environment explains between 12 and 18.5 % of the variance of children’s language skills. Although most authors agree that children whose parents encourage them to read tend to develop better and earlier reading skills, some authors consider that the impact of family environment in reading skills is overvalued. Probably, other variables of parent–child relationship, like parenting styles, might be relevant for this field. Nevertheless, no previous studies on the effect of parenting styles in literacy have been found. To analyze the role of parenting styles in the reading processes of children. Children’s perceptions of parenting styles contribute significantly to the explanation of statistical variance of children’s reading processes. 110 children (67 boys and 43 girls), aged between 7 and 11 years (M =\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$=$$\end{document} 9.22 and SD =\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$=$$\end{document} 1.14) from Portuguese schools answered to a socio-demographic questionnaire. To assess reading processes it was administered the Portuguese adaptation (Figueira et al. in press) of Bateria de Avaliação dos Processos Leitores-Revista (PROLEC-R). To assess the parenting styles Egna Minnen av Barndoms Uppfostran-parents (EMBU-P) and EMBU-C (children version) were administered. According to multiple hierarchical linear regressions, individual factors contribute to explain all reading tests of PROLEC-R, while family factors contribute to explain most of these tests. Regarding parenting styles, results evidence the explanatory power about grammatical structures, sentence comprehension and listening. Parenting styles have an important role in the explanation of higher reading processes (syntactic and semantic) but not in lexical processes, focused by main theories concerning dyslexia.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 914
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Alexander A(2004)Current status of treatments for dyslexia: Critical review Journal of Child Neurology 19 744-758
[2]  
Slinger-Constant A-M(2007)Socioemotional and behavioral adjustment among school-age children with learning disabilities: The moderating role of maternal personal resources The Journal of Special Education 40 205-217
[3]  
Al-Yagon M(2010)Parenting practices, parenting style, and children’s school achievement Psychological Studies 55 283-289
[4]  
Areepattamannil S(1995)Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy Review of Educational Research 65 1-21
[5]  
Bus AG(2007)A perceção dos filhos sobre os estilos educativos parentais: A versão portuguesa do EMBU-C RIDEP 24 193-210
[6]  
van IJzendoorn MH(2007)A avaliação dos estilos parentais educativos na perspectiva dos pais: A versão portuguesa do EMBU-P Psicologia: Teoria Investigação e Prática 2 271-286
[7]  
Pellegrini AD(2004)Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition 91 77-111
[8]  
Canavarro M(1993)Exploring the feasibility of assessing perceived parental rearing Journal of Social Psychiatry 39 47-57
[9]  
Pereira A(2004)Developmental dyslexia The Lancet: Seminar 363 1451-1460
[10]  
Canavarro MC(1991)The relationship between parental literacy level and perceptions of emergent literacy Journal of Reading Behavior 23 20-508