COVID-19 pandemic reveals challenges in engineering ethics education

被引:0
作者
Luan M. Nguyen
Cristina Poleacovschi
Kasey M. Faust
Kate Padgett-Walsh
Scott G. Feinstein
Bobby Vaziri
Michaela LaPatin
Cassandra J. Rutherford
机构
[1] Iowa State University,Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering
[2] The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering
[3] Iowa State University,Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies
[4] Iowa State University,Department of Political Science
[5] James Madison University,Department of Computer Information Systems and Business Analytics
来源
International Journal of Ethics Education | 2023年 / 8卷
关键词
Engineering ethics education; Technical ethics; Professional ethics; Social ethics; COVID-19;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Engineering ethics can be divided into three spheres, namely the technical, the professional, and the social. Ideally, engineering students should engage with all three spheres of ethics, but the literature suggests that this might not be the case. How do engineering students engage with the three spheres of engineering ethics during a global pandemic? The COVID-19 pandemic represents a dramatic and ongoing real-world challenge affecting many students personally. This research explores the extent to which engineering students engage with each sphere of engineering ethics by examining how engineering students understand their roles in addressing the pandemic and its implications. We conducted a survey with undergraduate engineering students (n = 410) at a university in the Midwest. Qualitative analysis suggests that there was low engagement with both social ethics and professional ethics among respondents, while there was higher engagement with technical ethics. Quantitative analysis suggests that non-conservative engineering students from less wealthy families in our study show higher engagement with technical ethics as compared to conservative engineering students from less wealthy families. Non-conservative engineering students from wealthy families, however, show similar engagement with technical ethics as compared to conservative engineering students from wealthy families. In addition, engineering students from both wealthy and less wealthy families show higher engagement with technical ethics if they reside in urban areas as compared to engineering students from both wealthy and less wealthy families in non-urban areas. In addition, the difference in terms of engagement with technical ethics between non-urban engineering students from less wealthy families and urban engineering students from less wealthy families is larger than the difference in terms of engagement with technical ethics between non-urban engineering students from wealthy families and urban engineering students from wealthy families. Further investigation will be needed to explain these findings. However, qualitative results confirm that, despite the potential for the pandemic to encourage engagement with all three spheres of ethics, there continues to be low engagement with ethics beyond the technical level.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 127
页数:28
相关论文
共 99 条
  • [1] Amadei B(2004)Engineering for the developing world Bridge 34 24-31
  • [2] Atak A(2019)Designer's ethical responsibility and ethical design Universal Journal of Mechanical Engineering 7 255-263
  • [3] Şık A(2017)Engineering student’s ethical awareness and behavior: A new motivational model Science and Engineering Ethics 23 1129-1157
  • [4] Bairaktarova D(2021)Engineering solutions to COVID-19 and racial and ethnic health disparities Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities 8 277-279
  • [5] Woodcock A(2013)Engineering ethics beyond engineers' ethics Science and Engineering Ethics 19 179-187
  • [6] Barabino GA(2014)Impacts of service-learning on the professional social responsibility attitudes of engineering students International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship 9 2-209
  • [7] Basart JM(2021)Initiatives, experiences and best practices for teaching social and ecological responsibility in ethics education for science and engineering students European Journal of Engineering Education 46 186-149
  • [8] Serra M(2008)Ethics and engineering education European Journal of Engineering Education 33 141-424
  • [9] Bielefeldt A(2015)Differences in engineering students’ views of social responsibility between disciplines Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 141 4-405
  • [10] Canney N(2015)A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers The International Journal of Engineering Education 31 414-72