Is War in Our Nature?What Is Right and What Is Wrong about the Seville Statement on Violence

被引:0
作者
Azar Gat
机构
[1] Tel Aviv University,School of Political Science
来源
Human Nature | 2019年 / 30卷
关键词
The Seville statement; UNESCO; Warfare; Conflict; Nature/nurture; Peace;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Seville Statement on Violence rejected the view that violence and war were in any way rooted in human nature and proclaimed that they were merely a cultural artifact. This paper points out both the valid and invalid parts of the statement. It concludes that the potential for both war and peace is embedded in us. The human behavioral toolkit comprises a number of major tools, respectively geared for violent conflict, peaceful competition, or cooperation, depending on people’s assessment of what will serve them best in any given circumstance. Conflict is only one tool—the hammer—in our diverse behavioral toolkit. However, all three behavioral strategies are not purely learned cultural forms. This naive nature/nurture dichotomy overlooks the heavy and complex biological machinery that is necessary for the working of each of them and the interplay between them. They are all very close under our skin and readily activated because they have all been very handy during our long evolutionary past. At the same time, they are variably calibrated to particular conditions through social learning, which means that their relative use may fluctuate widely. Thus, state authority has tilted the menu of human choices in the direction of the peaceful options in the domestic arena, and changing economic, social, and political conditions may be generating a similar effect in the international arena.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Beroldi G(1994)Critique of the Seville statement on violence American Psychologist 49 847-848
  • [2] Ember C(1978)Myths about hunter-gatherers Ethnology 17 439-448
  • [3] Fry D(2013)Lethal aggression in mobile forager bands and implications for the origins of war Science 341 270-273
  • [4] Söderberg P(1999)The pattern of fighting in simple, small-scale, pre-state societies Journal of Anthropological Research 55 563-583
  • [5] Gat A(2000)The human motivational complex: Evolutionary theory and the causes of hunter-gatherer fighting Anthropological Quarterly 73 20-34
  • [6] Gat A(2015)Proving communal warfare among hunter-gatherers: The quasi-Rousseauan error Evolutionary Anthropology 24 111-126
  • [7] Gat A(1987)Is human aggression nonbiological? Problems with the statement on violence Human Ethnology Newsletter 5 3-4
  • [8] Manson JH(1940)Warfare is only an invention—not a biological necessity Asia 40 402-405
  • [9] Wrangham RW(2001)A bioarchaeological perspective on the history of violence Annual Review of Anthropology 30 573-596
  • [10] Mead M(2006)Comparative rates of violence in chimpanzees and humans Primates 47 14-26