3D maps of RNA interhelical junctions

被引:0
作者
Maximillian H Bailor
Anthony M Mustoe
Charles L Brooks
Hashim M Al-Hashimi
机构
[1] The University of Michigan,Department of Chemistry and Biophysics
来源
Nature Protocols | 2011年 / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
More than 50% of RNA secondary structure is estimated to be A-form helices, which are linked together by various junctions. Here we describe a protocol for computing three interhelical Euler angles describing the relative orientation of helices across RNA junctions. 5′ and 3′ helices, H1 and H2, respectively, are assigned based on the junction topology. A reference canonical helix is constructed using an appropriate molecular builder software consisting of two continuous idealized A-form helices (iH1 and iH2) with helix axis oriented along the molecular Z-direction running toward the positive direction from iH1 to iH2. The phosphate groups and the carbon and oxygen atoms of the sugars are used to superimpose helix H1 of a target interhelical junction onto the corresponding iH1 of the reference helix. A copy of iH2 is then superimposed onto the resulting H2 helix to generate iH2′. A rotation matrix R is computed, which rotates iH2′ into iH2 and expresses the rotation parameters in terms of three Euler angles αh, βh and γh. The angles are processed to resolve a twofold degeneracy and to select an overall rotation around the axis of the reference helix. The three interhelical Euler angles define clockwise rotations around the 5′ (−γh) and 3′ (αh) helices and an interhelical bend angle (βh). The angles can be depicted graphically to provide a 'Ramachandran'-type view of RNA global structure that can be used to identify unusual conformations as well as to understand variations due to changes in sequence, junction topology and other parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1536 / 1545
页数:9
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Hooft RW(1997)Objectively judging the quality of a protein structure from a Ramachandran plot Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13 425-430
[2]  
Sander C(2003)A use of Ramachandran potentials in protein solution structure determinations J. Biomol. NMR 26 355-366
[3]  
Vriend G(2007)Conformational Angles DataBase (CADB-3.0) Prot. Pept. Lett. 14 665-668
[4]  
Bertini I(2007)Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials Proteins 68 232-242
[5]  
Cavallaro G(2010)A novel approach to segregate and identify functional loop regions in protein structures using their Ramachandran maps Proteins 78 900-916
[6]  
Luchinat C(2010) backbone scaffolds for protein design Proteins 78 1311-1325
[7]  
Poli I(2001)A standard reference frame for the description of nucleic acid base-pair geometry J. Mol. Biol. 313 229-237
[8]  
Gopalakrishnan K(1998)Stepping through an RNA structure: a novel approach to conformational analysis J. Mol. Biol. 284 1465-1478
[9]  
Sheik SS(2009)Do conformational biases of simple helical junctions influence RNA folding stability and specificity? RNA 15 2195-2205
[10]  
Ranjani CV(2003)Small-angle scattering: a view on the properties, structures and structural changes of biological macromolecules in solution Q. Rev. Biophys. 36 147-227