CVC syllables for investigating the phonetic sensitivity of Mandarin and English speakers

被引:0
作者
Miles Munro
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Cognitive Sciences
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2008年 / 40卷
关键词
Speech Sound; Phonetic Category; Mandarin Speaker; Contrast Pair; Phonetic Difference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although many individual speech contrasts pairs have been studied within the cross-language literature, no one has created a comprehensive and systematic set of such stimuli. This article justifies and details an extensive set of contrast pairs for Mandarin Chinese and American English. The stimuli consist of 180 pairs of CVC syllables recorded in two tokens each (720 syllables total). Between each CVC pair, two of the segments are identical, whereas the third differs in that a segment drawn from a “native” phonetic category (either Mandarin, English, or both) is partnered with a segment drawn from a “foreign” phonetic category (normative to Mandarin, English, or both). Each contrast pair differs by a minimal phonetic amount and constitutes a meaningful contrast among the world’s languages (as cataloged in the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database of 451 languages). The entire collection of phonetic differences envelops Mandarin and English phonetic spaces and generates a range of phonetic discriminability. Contrastive segments are balanced through all possible syllable positions, with noncontrastive segments being filled in with other “foreign” segments. Although intended to measure phonetic perceptual sensitivity among adult speakers of the two languages, these stimuli are offered here to all for similar or for altogether unrelated investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aoyama K.(2004)Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/and /r/ Journal of Phonetics 32 233-250
[2]  
Flege J. E.(1999)Left-hemisphere advantage for click consonants is determined by linguistic significance and experience Psychological Science 10 65-70
[3]  
Guion S. G.(2001)Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener’s native phonological system Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 775-794
[4]  
Akahane-Yamada R.(1988)Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 14 345-360
[5]  
Yamada T.(1992)Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants Journal of Phonetics 20 305-330
[6]  
Best C. T.(1986)Developmental loss of speech perception: Exposure to and experience with a first language Applied Psycholinguistics 7 207-240
[7]  
Avery R. A.(1996)The optimum decision rules in the Perception & Psychophysics 58 1-9
[8]  
Best C. T.(1981) paradigm TESOL Quarterly 15 443-455
[9]  
McRoberts G. W.(1984)The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 708-721
[10]  
Goodell E.(1984)Limits on pronunciation accuracy in adult foreign language speech production Journal of Phonetics 12 91-114