Using students as subjects - a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment

被引：402
作者：
Host M. [1 ]
Regnell B. [1 ]
Wohlin C. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Communication Systems, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund
来源：
Empirical Software Engineering | 2000年 / 5卷 / 3期
关键词：
Operating System; Empirical Study; Impact Assessment; Software Engineering; Software Developer;
D O I：
10.1023/A:1026586415054
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In many studies in software engineering students are used instead of professional software developers, although the objective is to draw conclusions valid for professional software developers. This paper presents a study where the difference between the two groups is evaluated. People from the two groups have individually carried out a non-trivial software engineering judgement task involving the assessment of how ten different factors affect the lead-time of software development projects. It is found that the differences are only minor, and it is concluded that software engineering students may be used instead of professional software developers under certain conditions. These conditions are identified and described based on generally accepted criteria for validity evaluation of empirical studies.
引用
收藏
页码：201 / 214
页数：13
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Cook T.D., Campbell D.T., Quasi-experimentation - Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, (1979)
  • [2] Fenton N., Pfleeger S.L., Software Metrics - A Rigorous & Practical Approach, Second Edition, (1996)
  • [3] Karlsson J., Ryan K., A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements, IEEE Software, pp. 67-74, (1997)
  • [4] Moynihan T., How experienced project managers assess risk, IEEE Software, pp. 35-41, (1997)
  • [5] Pickard L.M., Kitchenham B.A., Jones P.W., Combining empirical results in software engineering, Information and Software Technology, 40, 11, pp. 811-821, (1998)
  • [6] Porter A., Votta L., Basili V.R., Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: A replicated experiment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 216, pp. 563-575, (1995)
  • [7] Porter A., Votta L., Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspection: A replication using professional subjects, Empirical Software Engineering, 3, 4, pp. 355-380, (1998)
  • [8] Reel J.S., Critical success factors in software projects, IEEE Software, pp. 18-23, (1999)
  • [9] Robson C., Real World Research, (1993)
  • [10] Saaty T., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, (1980)
12