Measuring body composition in overweight individuals by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry

被引:42
作者
Brownbill R.A. [1 ]
Ilich J.Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Allied Health, University of Connecticut, Storrs
关键词
Bone Mineral Density; Bone Mineral Content; Overweight Individual; Bone Densitometer; Body Composition Assessment;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2342-5-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used for body composition measurements in normal-weight and overweight/obese individuals. The limitations of bone densitometers have been frequently addressed. However, the possible errors in assessing body composition in overweight individuals due to incorrect positioning or limitations of DXA to accurately assess both bone mineral density and body composition in obese individuals have not received much attention and are the focus of this report. Discussion: We discuss proper ways of measuring overweight individuals and point to some studies where that might not have been the case. It appears that currently, the most prudent approach to assess body composition of large individuals who cannot fit under the scanning area would be to estimate regional fat, namely the regions of thigh and/or abdomen. Additionally, using two-half body scans, although time consuming, may provide a relatively accurate measurement of total body fat, however, more studies using this technique are needed to validate it. Summary: Researchers using bone densitometers for body composition measurements need to have an understanding of its limitations in overweight individuals and address them appropriately when interpreting their results. Studies on accuracy and precision in measurements of both bone and soft tissue composition in overweight individuals using available densitometers are needed. © 2005 Brownbill and Ilich; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Bonnick S.L., Densitometry Techniques, Bonedensitometry in Clinical Practice: Application and Interpretation, pp. 1-28, (2003)
  • [2] DPX Series Operator's Manual, (1998)
  • [3] Bone densitometry, body composition analysis, (2005)
  • [4] Cummings S.R., Palermo L., Browner W., Marcus R., Wallace R., Pearson J., Blackwell T., Eckert S., Black D., Monitoring osteoporosis therapy with bone densitometry: Misleading changes and regression to the mean, JAMA, 283, pp. 1318-1321, (2000)
  • [5] Tothill P., Hannan W.J., Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 904, pp. 63-71, (2001)
  • [6] Laskey M.A., Murgatroyd P.R., Prentice A., Comparison of narrow-angle fan-beam and pencil-beam densitometers: In vivo and phantom study of the effect of bone density, scan mode, and tissue depth on spine measurements, J. Clin. Densitometry, 7, pp. 341-348, (2004)
  • [7] Lohman T.G., Harris M., Teixeira P.J., Weiss L., Assessing body composition and changes in body composition. Another look at dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 904, pp. 45-54, (2000)
  • [8] Tylavsky F.A., Lohman T.G., Dockrell M., Lang T., Schoeller D.A., Wan J.Y., Fuerst T., Cauley J.A., Nevitt M., Harris T.B., Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 77, pp. 356-363, (2003)
  • [9] Yang Y., Zhu W.D., Paton N.L., Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry machines for measuring fat distribution changes of HIV-associated lipodystrophy, Antivir. Ther., 9, pp. 771-778, (2004)
  • [10] Roubenoff R., Kehyias J.J., Dawson-Hughes B., Heymsfield S.B., Use of dual-energy x-ray abdorptiometry in body-composition studies: Not yet a "gold standard, Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 58, pp. 589-591, (1993)