Prognostic and Predictive Value of Thymidylate Synthase Expression in Colon Cancer

被引:0
作者
Gerasimos Tsourouflis
Stamatios E. Theocharis
Anastasia Sampani
Athina Giagini
Alkiviadis Kostakis
Gregory Kouraklis
机构
[1] University of Athens,Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Medical School
[2] University of Athens,Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Medical School
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2008年 / 53卷
关键词
Cell cycle-related molecules; Colon cancer; Thymidylate synthase;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thymidylate synthase (TS) is an enzyme responsible for DNA synthesis. Its competitive inhibition constitutes the major mechanism of the antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy, which significantly improves the survival rate of colon cancer patients. The aim of our study was to examine the clinical importance of TS expression in colon cancer patients and to correlate its expression with various clinicopathological parameters, tumor proliferative capacity, cell cycle-related molecules’ expression and patients’ survival. Of the 71 colon cancer patients studied, 51 (71.8%) tested positive for TS, with the positive result being statistically significantly correlated with patients’ gender (P = 0.012), tumor histological grade (P = 0.032), vascular invasion (P = 0.017) and the expression of cyclin E, pRb and p16 (P = 0.042, P = 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). The overall 5-year survival rate was 40% for TS-positive patients and 68.6% for TS-negative ones (P = 0.0134); in patients aged >70 years, this was 30 and 77.8%, respectively (P = 0.0008). In a multivariate analysis of survival, TS expression proved to be of prognostic significance (P = 0.0174). Our findings support evidence for the clinical importance of TS expression in colon cancer patients and define it as an independent prognostic risk factor.
引用
收藏
页码:1289 / 1296
页数:7
相关论文
共 250 条
[1]  
Johnston PG(1995)Colorectal cancer biology: clinical implications Semin Oncol 22 418-432
[2]  
Allegra CJ(2003)Thymidylate synthase protein expression in primary colorectal cancer: lack of correlation with outcome and response to fluorouracil in metastatic disease sites J Clin Oncol 21 815-819
[3]  
Johnston PG(1999)Comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes’ B versus Dukes’ C colon cancer: result from four National surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project adjuvant studies C-01, C-02, C-03, & C-04) J Clin Oncol 17 1349-1355
[4]  
Benson AB(2004)Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Clin Oncol 22 529-536
[5]  
Catalano P(1981)The incorporation of 5-fluoro-2′-deoxyuridine into DNA of mammalian tumor cells Biochem Biophys Res Commun 102 654-658
[6]  
Rao MS(1995)The catalytic mechanism and structure of thymidylate synthase Annu Rev Biochem 64 721-762
[7]  
O’Dwyer PJ(1992)Immunological quantitation of thymidylate synthase using the monoclonal antibody TS 106 in 5-fluorouracil sensitive and resistant human cancer cell lines Cancer Res 52 4306-4312
[8]  
Allegra CJ(1996)Resistance to Tomudex (ZD1694): multifactorial in human breast and colon carcinoma cell lines Biochem Pharmacol 51 1349-1355
[9]  
Mamounas E(1999)Clinical trial to assess the relative efficacy of fluorouracil and leucovorin, fluorouracil and levamisole, and fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in patients with Dukes’ B and C carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04 J Clin Oncol 17 3553-3559
[10]  
Wieand S(1998)Fluorouracil, leucovorin and levamisole adjuvant therapy for colon cancer: five-year final report of INT-0089 Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17 256a-S89