Fuzzy probabilistic seismic hazard analysis with applications to Kunming city, China

被引:0
作者
Jelena M. Andrić
Da-Gang Lu
机构
[1] Harbin Institute of Technology,Research Group of Reliability and Risk Engineering (RARE), School of Civil Engineering
来源
Natural Hazards | 2017年 / 89卷
关键词
Earthquakes; Seismic hazard; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy sets; Ground motion; Peak ground acceleration; Kunming city;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China is prone to highly frequent earthquakes due to specific geographical location, which could cause significant losses to society and economy. The task of seismic hazard analysis is to estimate the potential level of ground motion parameters that would be produced by future earthquakes. In this paper, a novel method based on fuzzy logic techniques and probabilistic approach is proposed for seismic hazard analysis (FPSHA). In FPSHA, we employ fuzzy sets for quantification of earthquake magnitude and source-to-site distance, and fuzzy inference rules for ground motion attenuation relationships. The membership functions for earthquake magnitude and source-to-site distance are provided based on expert judgments, and the construction of fuzzy rules for peak ground acceleration relationships is also based on expert judgment. This methodology enables to include aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in the process of seismic hazard analysis. The advantage of the proposed method is in its efficiency, reliability, practicability, and precision. A case study is investigated for seismic hazard analysis of Kunming city in Yunnan Province, People’s Republic of China. The results of the proposed fuzzy logic-based model are compared to other models, which confirms the accuracy in predicting the probability of exceeding a certain level of the peak ground acceleration. Further, the results can provide a sound basis for decision making of disaster reduction and prevention in Yunnan province.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1057
页数:26
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Ahumada A(2015)Fuzzy logic-based attenuation relationships of strong motion earthquake records Expert Syst Appl 42 1287-1297
[2]  
Altunkaynak A(2015)Comparison between the effects of different types of membership functions on fuzzy logic controller performance Int J 76 76-83
[3]  
Ayoub A(2006)Fuzzy-reasoning-based approach to qualitative railway risk assessment Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 220 153-167
[4]  
Ali OAM(2007)Railway risk assessment-the fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: a case study of shunting at waterloo depot Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 221 365-383
[5]  
Ali AY(2016)Risk assessment of bridges under multiple hazards in operation period Saf Sci 83 80-92
[6]  
Sumait BS(2017)Fuzzy methods for prediction of seismic resilience of bridges Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 22 458-468
[7]  
An M(2013)Development of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for international sites, challenges and guidelines Nucl Eng Des 259 222-229
[8]  
Lin W(2008)An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) White Pap Vers 1 72-168
[9]  
Stirling A(2003)Uncertainty about the uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis Eng Geol 70 165-857
[10]  
An M(2001)A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system Adv Eng Softw 32 847-61