The skewness risk premium in equilibrium and stock return predictability

被引:12
作者
Sasaki H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mizuho-DL Financial Technology Co., Ltd., 2-4-1 Koujimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo
关键词
Epstein–Zin preferences; Jump intensity; Long-run risks model; Skewness risk premium; Stochastic volatility; Stock return predictability; Variance risk premium; Volatility of volatility;
D O I
10.1007/s10436-016-0275-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we investigate the skewness risk premium in the financial market under a general equilibrium setting. Extending the long-run risks (LRR) model proposed by Bansal and Yaron (J Financ 59:1481–1509, 2004) by introducing a stochastic jump intensity for jumps in the LRR factor and the variance of consumption growth rate, we provide an explicit representation for the skewness risk premium, as well as the volatility risk premium, in equilibrium. On the basis of the representation for the skewness risk premium, we propose a possible reason for the empirical facts of time-varying and negative risk-neutral skewness. Moreover, we also provide an equity risk premium representation of a linear factor pricing model with the variance and skewness risk premiums. The empirical results imply that the skewness risk premium, as well as the variance risk premium, has superior predictive power for future aggregate stock market index returns, which are consistent with the theoretical implication derived by our model. Compared with the variance risk premium, the results show that the skewness risk premium plays an independent and essential role for predicting the market index returns. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 133
页数:38
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Ait-Sahalia Y., Lo A., Nonparametric estimation of state-price-densities implicit in financial asset prices, J Financ, 53, pp. 499-547, (1998)
[2]  
Ait-Sahalia Y., Wang W., Yared F., Do option markets correctly price the probabilities of movement of the underlying asset?, J Econ, 102, pp. 67-110, (2001)
[3]  
Bakshi G., Kapadia N., Madan D., Stock return characteristics, skew laws, and the differential pricing of individual equity options, Rev Financ Stud, 16, pp. 101-143, (2003)
[4]  
Bali T., Hovakimian A., Volatility spread and expected stock returns, Manage Sci, 55, pp. 1797-1812, (2009)
[5]  
Bansal R., Yaron A., Risks for the long run: a potential resolution of asset-pricing puzzles, J Financ, 59, pp. 1481-1509, (2004)
[6]  
Black F., Studies of stock market volatility changes, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 177-181, (1976)
[7]  
Bollerslev T., Sizova N., Tauchen G., Volatility in equilibrium: asymmetries and dynamic dependencies, Rev Financ, 16, pp. 31-80, (2012)
[8]  
Bollerslev T., Tauchen G., Zhou H., Expected stock returns and variance risk premia, Rev Financ Stud, 22, pp. 4463-4492, (2009)
[9]  
Campbell J., Shiller R.J., The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors, Rev Financ Stud, 1, pp. 195-227, (1988)
[10]  
Chan W., Maheu J.M., Conditional jump dynamics in stock market returns, J Bus Econ Stat, 20, pp. 377-389, (2002)