Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures

被引:0
作者
Ahmed M. Zihni
Ikechukwu Ohu
Jaime A. Cavallo
Sohyung Cho
Michael M. Awad
机构
[1] Washington University School of Medicine,Department of Surgery, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery
[2] Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville,Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2014年 / 28卷
关键词
Ergonomics; Robot-assisted surgery; Laparoscopic surgery; Human factors; Electromyography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:3379 / 3384
页数:5
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Bhogal RH(2008)Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease World J Surg 32 2371-2374
[2]  
Athwal R(2011)Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9 CD006124-786
[3]  
Durkin D(2012)Laparoscopic versus open adhesiolysis in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Surg 204 779-109
[4]  
Deakin M(2010)The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19 105-313
[5]  
Cheruvu CN(2010)Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic J Am Coll Surg 210 306-970
[6]  
Wilson CH(2003)A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques Arch Surg 138 967-1207
[7]  
Sanni A(2001)Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery Surg Endosc 15 1204-188
[8]  
Rix DA(2009)Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery Surg Endosc 23 182-462
[9]  
Soomro NA(1998)Surgical technology and the ergonomics of laparoscopic instruments Surg Endosc 12 458-1173
[10]  
Li MZ(2012)Robot-assisted surgery: impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery Int Urogynecol J 23 1163-430