Risk factors for polyetheretherketone cage subsidence following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

[1] Abbushi A(2009)The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation Eur Spine J 18 1621-1628

[2] Cabraja M(2017)Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey Spine 42 55-62

[3] Thomale UW(1995)Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion A prospective multicenter study Spine 20 2211-2216

[4] Woiciechowsky C(2013)Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 Eur Spine J 22 2869-2875

[5] Kroppenstedt SN(2003)Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome Spine J 3 289-293

[6] Abe K(1995)Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 20 1410-1418

[7] Orita S(2006)Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages Eur Spine J 15 16-22

[8] Mannoji C(2018)Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: radiological and clinical results from a prospective randomized clinical trial Neurosurgery 82 289-298

[9] Motegi H(2016)The fusion rate of demineralized bone matrix compared with autogenous iliac bone graft for long multi-segment posterolateral spinal fusion BMC musculoskelet disord 17 3-2027

[10] Aramomi M(2014)Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database Spine J 14 2019-5

[1] Abbushi A(2009)The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation Eur Spine J 18 1621-1628

[2] Cabraja M(2017)Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey Spine 42 55-62

[3] Thomale UW(1995)Comparison between allograft plus demineralized bone matrix versus autograft in anterior cervical fusion A prospective multicenter study Spine 20 2211-2216

[4] Woiciechowsky C(2013)Fusion and subsidence rate of stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion using PEEK cage with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 Eur Spine J 22 2869-2875

[5] Kroppenstedt SN(2003)Anterior lumbar fusion with paired BAK standard and paired BAK Proximity cages: subsidence incidence, subsidence factors, and clinical outcome Spine J 3 289-293

[6] Abe K(1995)Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects? Spine 20 1410-1418

[7] Orita S(2006)Subsidence after anterior lumbar interbody fusion using paired stand-alone rectangular cages Eur Spine J 15 16-22

[8] Mannoji C(2018)Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using banana-shaped and straight cages: radiological and clinical results from a prospective randomized clinical trial Neurosurgery 82 289-298

[9] Motegi H(2016)The fusion rate of demineralized bone matrix compared with autogenous iliac bone graft for long multi-segment posterolateral spinal fusion BMC musculoskelet disord 17 3-2027

[10] Aramomi M(2014)Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database Spine J 14 2019-5