Novel Data Transformations for RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zeyu Zhang
Danyang Yu
Minseok Seo
Craig P. Hersh
Scott T. Weiss
Weiliang Qiu
机构
[1] Tongji University,Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences and Technology
[2] Hunan University,Department of Information and Computing Science, College of Mathematics and Econometrics
[3] Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School,Channing Division of Network Medicine
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We propose eight data transformations (r, r2, rv, rv2, l, l2, lv, and lv2) for RNA-seq data analysis aiming to make the transformed sample mean to be representative of the distribution center since it is not always possible to transform count data to satisfy the normality assumption. Simulation studies showed that for data sets with small (e.g., nCases = nControls = 3) or large sample size (e.g., nCases = nControls = 100) limma based on data from the l, l2, and r2 transformations performed better than limma based on data from the voom transformation in term of accuracy, FDR, and FNR. For datasets with moderate sample size (e.g., nCases = nControls = 30 or 50), limma with the rv and rv2 transformations performed similarly to limma with the voom transformation. Real data analysis results are consistent with simulation analysis results: limma with the r, l, r2, and l2 transformation performed better than limma with the voom transformation when sample sizes are small or large; limma with the rv and rv2 transformations performed similarly to limma with the voom transformation when sample sizes are moderate. We also observed from our data analyses that for datasets with large sample size, the gene-selection via the Wilcoxon rank sum test (a non-parametric two sample test method) based on the raw data outperformed limma based on the transformed data.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Power analysis for RNA-Seq differential expression studies
    Yu, Lianbo
    Fernandez, Soledad
    Brock, Guy
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 18
  • [22] Power analysis for RNA-Seq differential expression studies
    Lianbo Yu
    Soledad Fernandez
    Guy Brock
    BMC Bioinformatics, 18
  • [23] Differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data at single-base resolution
    Frazee, Alyssa C.
    Sabunciyan, Sarven
    Hansen, Kasper D.
    Irizarry, Rafael A.
    Leek, Jeffrey T.
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2014, 15 (03) : 413 - 426
  • [24] Robustness of differential gene expression analysis of RNA-seq
    Stupnikov, A.
    McInerney, C. E.
    Savage, K. I.
    McIntosh, S. A.
    Emmert-Streib, F.
    Kennedy, R.
    Salto-Tellez, M.
    Prise, K. M.
    McArt, D. G.
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 19 : 3470 - 3481
  • [25] An iteration normalization and test method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data
    Yan Zhou
    Nan Lin
    Baoxue Zhang
    BioData Mining, 7
  • [26] Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data
    Franck Rapaport
    Raya Khanin
    Yupu Liang
    Mono Pirun
    Azra Krek
    Paul Zumbo
    Christopher E Mason
    Nicholas D Socci
    Doron Betel
    Genome Biology, 14
  • [27] rmRNAseq: differential expression analysis for repeated-measures RNA-seq data
    Nguyen, Yet
    Nettleton, Dan
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2020, 36 (16) : 4432 - 4439
  • [28] Error estimates for the analysis of differential expression from RNA-seq count data
    Burden, Conrad J.
    Qureshi, Sumaira E.
    Wilson, Susan R.
    PEERJ, 2014, 2
  • [29] Measuring differential gene expression with RNA-seq: challenges and strategies for data analysis
    Finotello, Francesca
    Di Camillo, Barbara
    BRIEFINGS IN FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS, 2015, 14 (02) : 130 - 142
  • [30] contamDE: differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data for contaminated tumor samples
    Shen, Qi
    Hu, Jiyuan
    Jiang, Ning
    Hu, Xiaohua
    Luo, Zewei
    Zhang, Hong
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 32 (05) : 705 - 712