Automated classification of focal breast lesions according to S-detect: validation and role as a clinical and teaching tool

被引:58
作者
Di Segni M. [1 ]
de Soccio V. [1 ]
Cantisani V. [1 ]
Bonito G. [1 ]
Rubini A. [1 ]
Di Segni G. [2 ]
Lamorte S. [1 ]
Magri V. [1 ]
De Vito C. [3 ]
Migliara G. [3 ]
Bartolotta T.V. [4 ]
Metere A. [5 ]
Giacomelli L. [5 ]
de Felice C. [1 ]
D’Ambrosio F. [1 ]
机构
[1] U.O.C. Diagnostica per Immagini, P. O San Paolo - ASL Roma 4, Largo dei Donatori del Sangue 1, Civitavecchia (RM)
[2] Arakne S.r.l., Via Edoardo d’Onofrio, 304, Rome, 00155, RM
[3] Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome
[4] Department of Radiology, University of Palermo, Palermo
[5] Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, viale del Policlinico 155, Rome
关键词
Breast lesion characterization; Breast tumors; CAD; S-detect; US-elastography;
D O I
10.1007/s40477-018-0297-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance and the potential as a teaching tool of S-detect in the assessment of focal breast lesions. Methods: 61 patients (age 21–84 years) with benign breast lesions in follow-up or candidate to pathological sampling or with suspicious lesions candidate to biopsy were enrolled. The study was based on a prospective and on a retrospective phase. In the prospective phase, after completion of baseline US by an experienced breast radiologist and S-detect assessment, 5 operators with different experience and dedication to breast radiology performed elastographic exams. In the retrospective phase, the 5 operators performed a retrospective assessment and categorized lesions with BI-RADS 2013 lexicon. Integration of S-detect to in-training operators evaluations was performed by giving priority to S-detect analysis in case of disagreement. 2 × 2 contingency tables and ROC analysis were used to assess the diagnostic performances; inter-rater agreement was measured with Cohen’s k; Bonferroni’s test was used to compare performances. A significance threshold of p = 0.05 was adopted. Results: All operators showed sensitivity > 90% and varying specificity (50–75%); S-detect showed sensitivity > 90 and 70.8% specificity, with inter-rater agreement ranging from moderate to good. Lower specificities were improved by the addition of S-detect. The addition of elastography did not lead to any improvement of the diagnostic performance. Conclusions: S-detect is a feasible tool for the characterization of breast lesions; it has a potential as a teaching tool for the less experienced operators. © 2018, Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 118
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Hooley R.J., Scoutt L.M., Philpotts L.E., Breast ultrasonography: state of the art, Radiology, 268, pp. 642-659, (2013)
  • [2] D'Orsi C.J., Sickles E.A., Mendelson E.B., Morris E.A., Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, (2013)
  • [3] Rao A.A., Feneis J., Lalonde C., Ojeda-Fournier H., A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition, RadioGraphics, 36, pp. 623-639, (2016)
  • [4] Lee J., Practical and illustrated summary of updated BI-RADS for ultrasonography, Ultrasonography, 36, pp. 71-81, (2017)
  • [5] Spak D.A., Plaxco J.S., Santiago L., Dryden M.J., Dogan B.E., BI-RADS <sup>®</sup> fifth edition: a summary of changes, Diagn Interv Imaging, 98, pp. 179-190, (2017)
  • [6] Goddi A., Bonardi M., Alessi S., Breast elastography: a literature review, J Ultrasound, 15, pp. 192-198, (2012)
  • [7] Drudi F., Giovagnorio F., Carbone A., Ricci P., Petta S., Cantisani V., Ferrari F., Marchetti F., Passariello R., Transrectal colour Doppler contrast sonography in the diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy—comparison with MRI, Ultraschall in der Medizin Eur J Ultrasound, 28, pp. 146-151, (2006)
  • [8] Cantisani V., Ricci P., Erturk M., Pagliara E., Drudi F., Calliada F., Mortele K., D'Ambrosio U., Marigliano C., Catalano C., Detection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: prospective evaluation of gray scale US versus SonoVue<sup>®</sup> low mechanical index real-time enhanced US as compared with multidetector-CT or Gd-BOPTA-MRI, Ultraschall in der Medizin-Eur J Ultrasound, 31, pp. 500-505, (2010)
  • [9] Bamber J., Cosgrove D., Dietrich C., Fromageau J., Bojunga J., Calliada F., Cantisani V., Correas J.-M., D'Onofrio M., Drakonaki E., Fink M., Friedrich-Rust M., Gilja O., Havre R., Jenssen C., Klauser A., Ohlinger R., Saftoiu A., Schaefer F., Sporea I., Piscaglia F., EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology, Ultraschall in der Medizin Eur J Ultrasound, 34, pp. 169-184, (2013)
  • [10] Shiina T., Nightingale K.R., Palmeri M.L., Hall T.J., Bamber J.C., Barr R.G., Castera L., Choi B.I., Chou Y.-H., Cosgrove D., Dietrich C.F., Ding H., Amy D., Farrokh A., Ferraioli G., Filice C., Friedrich-Rust M., Nakashima K., Schafer F., Sporea I., Suzuki S., Wilson S., Kudo M., WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology, Ultrasound Med Biol, 41, pp. 1126-1147, (2015)