Addressing Sexuality as Standard Care in People with an Upper Limb Deficiency: Taboo or Necessary Topic?

被引:0
作者
J. E. A. Verschuren
J. H. B. Geertzen
P. Enzlin
P. U. Dijkstra
R. Dekker
C. K. van der Sluis
机构
[1] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Rehabilitation
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Development and Regeneration, Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies
[3] KU Leuven,Department of Psychiatry, Context, Center for Marital, Family and Sex Therapy
[4] UPC KU Leuven,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
[5] University Medical Center Groningen,undefined
[6] University of Groningen,undefined
来源
Sexuality and Disability | 2013年 / 31卷
关键词
Amputation; Upper extremity; Sexuality; Rehabilitation; The Netherlands;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to analyze whether professionals who work with people with an upper limb deficiency (ULD) received questions about sexuality from their patients and whether they addressed sexuality themselves, and to analyze their knowledge and comfort level, approach and attitudes towards sexuality. An online questionnaire, including questions on self-perceived sexological competence and the Knowledge, Comfort, Approach and Attitudes towards Sexuality Scale (KCAASS) was used to asses these aspects. One out of three professionals had received a question about sexuality from their patients. Nearly one out of five professionals had addressed sexuality themselves. Professionals who received a question about sexuality from patients or addressed this issue themselves had significantly higher scores on self-perceived knowledge about sexuality and on self-perceived conversation skills compared to professionals who did not. The scores on the KCAASS Knowledge and Comfort of professionals who received a question about sexuality or addressed the issue of sexuality were significantly higher than those of professionals who did not. Sexuality is thus only scantly discussed by professionals working with patients with an ULD. Professionals indicated they do not feel confident nor comfortable enough to address this issue. They also experience a lack of appropriate knowledge to address sexuality with patients. Professionals reported a need for courses and training on both knowledge and conversation skills concerning sexuality. In addition, a protocol and necessary facilities need to be provided for the team working with people with an ULD in order to be able to address sexuality systematically.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:10
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Saradjian A(2008)The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different Disabil. Rehabil. 30 871-883
[2]  
Thompson AR(2001)Upper extremity amputation and prosthetics J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 38 vii-x
[3]  
Datta D(2009)Sexuality and amputation: a systematic literature review Disabil. Rehabil. 31 522-527
[4]  
Baumgartner RF(1982)Sexual reactivation of chronically ill and disabled adults J. Allied Health 11 261-270
[5]  
Geertzen JH(2002)Sexuality in persons with limb amputation Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 26 189-194
[6]  
Van Es CG(2000)Sexuality in persons with lower extremity amputations Disabil. Rehabil. 22 409-415
[7]  
Dijkstra PU(2004)Sexuality in persons with limb amputation: a meaningful discussion of re-integration Disabil. Rehabil. 26 939-943
[8]  
Conine TA(2007)Let’s talk about sex: risky business for cancer and palliative care clinicians Contemp. Nurse 27 49-60
[9]  
Evans JH(2005)Sexuality in stroke care: a neglected quality of life issue in stroke rehabilitation? A pilot study Sex. Disabil. 23 213-226
[10]  
Ide M(2003)The development of a scale to assess the training needs of professionals in providing sexuality rehabilitation following spinal cord injury Sex. Disabil. 21 49-64