A guide to peer reviewing for Spinal Cord

被引：0
作者：
Marcel P. Dijkers
机构：
[1] Wayne State University,
来源：
Spinal Cord | 2021年 / 59卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Peer reviewing is a key mechanism underlying science publishing, but during their graduate training clinicians and researchers are unlikely to be taught the skill. This paper sets forth the art of peer reviewing in general, and the types of reviews that are most useful to the Editors of Spinal Cord (SC). The topics addressed are: the SC editorial process; the role of the referee; review process steps; the content and language of a review; and resources available to peer reviewers.
引用
收藏
页码：571 / 581
页数：10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Kronick DA(1990)Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism JAMA. 263 1321-2
[2]  
Del Mar C(2015)A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials BMC Med 13 958-64
[3]  
Hoffmann TC(2014)Manuscript rejection: How to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer Plast Reconstr Surgery 133 68-81
[4]  
Kotsis SV(2015)Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med 13 1076-704
[5]  
Chung KC(2018)peer-review a scientific article? A personal perspective Annals of translational medicine 6 698-9
[6]  
Moher D(2016)Writing highly effective reviews of a scientific manuscript Freshw Sci 35 227-11
[7]  
Lippi G(2012)Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals Medical teacher 34 109-8
[8]  
How I(2020)Do’s and don’ts for a good reviewer of scientific papers: a beginner’s brief decalogue Int J Low Extrem Wounds 19 321-7
[9]  
do GJ(2016)How to review a manuscript J Electrocardiol 49 13-4
[10]  
Scrimgeour SD(2014)Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica journal Biochem Med 24 112-33
1234