Incentive effects of class actions and punitive damages under alternative procedural regimes

被引:0
作者
Marta Cenini
Barbara Luppi
Francesco Parisi
机构
[1] University of Milan,Faculty of Law
[2] University of Modena and Reggio Emilia,Faculty of Economics
[3] University of Minnesota,Law School
[4] University of Bologna,Faculty of Economics
来源
European Journal of Law and Economics | 2011年 / 32卷
关键词
Punitive damages; Class actions; Loser-Pays rule; Incentives; K13; K4;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In an economic perspective, punitive damages and class actions can be viewed as sharing a common economic function—creating optimal deterrence. Building on Parisi and Cenini (Class actions for Europe: perspectives from law and economics, ELGAR, 2010), we study the effect of alternative procedural regimes on the effectiveness of punitive damages and class actions. Specifically, we compare the workings of punitive damages and class actions in the American and English (“loser-pays”) regimes. Our findings help explain the limited use and late adoption of class actions and punitive damages in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 240
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Bittle LF(1987)Punitive damages and the eighth amendment: An analytical frame-work for determining excessiveness California Law Review 75 1433-1450
[2]  
Bronsteen J.(2003)The class action rule Notre Dame Law Review 78 1419-1454
[3]  
Fiss O. M.(1990)Critical reappraisal of punitive damages encompassing Attorney’s Fees: Normative analysis and pragmatic concerns Baylor Law Review 42 737-492
[4]  
Craswell R(1996)Damage multipliers in market relationships Journal of Legal Studies 25 463-917
[5]  
Dobbs DB(1989)Ending punishment in punitive damages: Deterrence measured remedies Alabama Law Review 40 831-158
[6]  
Jeffries JC(1986)A comment on the constitutionality of punitive damages Virginia Law Review 72 139-1149
[7]  
Mesulam S(2004)Collective rewards and limited punishment: Solving the punitive damages dilemma with class Columbia Law Review 104 1114-1155
[8]  
Nagareda RA(2001)Engle v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.: lessons in state class actions, punitive damages, and jury decision-making Wake Forest Law Review 36 1129-968
[9]  
Nagareda RA(2001)Punitive damages class actions and the baseline of tort Wake Forest Law Review 36 943-962
[10]  
Polinsky AM(1998)Punitive damages: An economic analysis Harvard Law Review 111 869-356