Treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria with an inadequate response to H1-antihistamines: an expert opinion

被引:0
作者
Christian Vestergaard
Elias Toubi
Marcus Maurer
Massimo Triggiani
Barbara Ballmer-Weber
Alexander Marsland
Marta Ferrer
André Knulst
Ana Giménez-Arnau
机构
[1] Aarhus University Hospital,Hospital del Mar
[2] Bnai-Zion Medical Centre,undefined
[3] Charité-Universitätsmedizin,undefined
[4] University of Salerno,undefined
[5] University Hospital Zurich,undefined
[6] Salford Royal Hospital and University of Manchester,undefined
[7] Clinica Universidad de Navarra,undefined
[8] University Medical Centre,undefined
[9] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,undefined
来源
European Journal of Dermatology | 2017年 / 27卷
关键词
chronic spontaneous urticarial; H1-antihistamines; omalizumab; response; treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by the sudden, continuous or intermittent appearance of pruritic wheals (hives), angioedema, or both for six weeks or more, with no known specific trigger. The international EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO urticaria guideline advises standard-dose, second-generation H1-antihistamines as firstline therapy. However, H1-antihistamine treatment leads to absence of symptoms in fewer than 50% of patients. Updosing of secondgeneration H1-antihistamines (up to fourfold) as recommended by the EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO urticaria guideline as second-line therapy, can improve response, but many patients remain symptomatic. Definitions of response are often subjective and a consensus is needed regarding appropriate treatment targets. There is also an unmet need for biomarkers to assess CSU severity and activity and to predict treatment response. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO urticaria guideline recommends addon omalizumab, ciclosporinA(CsA), or montelukast third-line treatment in patients with an inadequate response to high-dose H1-antihistamines. Omalizumab is currently the only licensed systemic biologic for use in CSU. Both omalizumab and CsA are effective third-lineCSUtreatments; montelukast appears to have lower efficacy in this setting. Omalizumab carries a label warning for anaphylaxis, although no cases of anaphylaxis were reported in the phase III trials of omalizumab in CSU and it is generally well tolerated in patients with CSU. Omalizumab arguably has a better safety profile than CsA.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:9
相关论文
共 323 条
  • [1] Zuberbier T(2015)Omalizumab for the treatment of chronic urticaria Expert Rev Clin Immunol 11 171-80
  • [2] Maurer M(2014)The EAACI/GA2LEN/ EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria The 2013 revision and update. Allergy 69 868-87
  • [3] Zuberbier T(2011)Unmet clinical needs in chronic spontaneous urticaria A GA2LEN task force report. Allergy 66 317-30
  • [4] Aberer W(2009)EAACI/GA2LEN/ EDF/WAO guideline: management of urticaria Allergy 64 1427-43
  • [5] Asero R(2015)Retrospective case note review of chronic spontaneous urticaria outcomes and adverse effects in patients treated with omalizumab or ciclosporin in UK secondary care Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 11 21-73
  • [6] Maurer M(2010)Epidemiology of urticaria: a representative cross-sectional population survey Clin Exp Dermatol 35 869-40
  • [7] Weller K(1972)The prevalence of urticaria in the total population Acta Allergol 27 236-20
  • [8] Bindslev-Jensen C(2004)M, et al Epidemiology of urticaria in Spain. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 14 214-301
  • [9] Zuberbier T(2007)Chronic idiopathic urticaria: prevalence and clinical course J Dermatol 34 294-9
  • [10] Asero R(2009)The impact of chronic idiopathic urticaria on quality of life in Korean patients Ann Dermatol 21 226-201