A comparative study of different online model parameters identification methods for lithium-ion battery

被引:0
作者
ShuZhi Zhang
XiongWen Zhang
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,MOE Key Laboratory of Thermo
来源
Science China Technological Sciences | 2021年 / 64卷
关键词
lithium-ion battery; Thevenin model; online model parameters identification methods; state-of-charge; comprehensive performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precise states estimation for the lithium-ion battery is one of the fundamental tasks in the battery management system (BMS), where building an accurate battery model is the first step in model-based estimation algorithms. To date, although the comparative studies on different battery models have been performed intensively, little attention is paid to the comparison among different online parameters identification methods regarding model accuracy, robustness ability, adaptability to the different battery operating conditions and computation cost. In this paper, based on the Thevenin model, the three most widely used online parameters identification methods, including extended Kalman filter (EKF), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and recursive least square (RLS), are evaluated comprehensively under static and dynamic tests. It is worth noting that, although the built model’s terminal voltage may well follow a measured curve, these identified model parameters may significantly out of reasonable range, which means that the error between measured and predicted terminal voltage cannot be seen as a gist to determine which model is the most accurate. To evaluate model accuracy more rigorously, battery state-of-charge (SOC) is further estimated based on identified model parameters under static and dynamic tests. The SOC prediction results show that EKF and RLS algorithms are more suitable to be used for online model parameters identification under static and dynamic tests, respectively. Moreover, the random offset is added into originally measured data to verify the robustness ability of different methods, whose results indicate EKF and RLS have more satisfactory ability against imprecisely sampled data under static and dynamic tests, respectively. Considering model accuracy, robustness ability, adaptability to the different battery operating conditions and computation cost simultaneously, EKF is recommended to be adopted to establish battery model in real application among these three most widely used methods.
引用
收藏
页码:2312 / 2327
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Hannan M A(2017)A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78 834-854
[2]  
Lipu M S H(2015)Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage Nat Chem 7 19-29
[3]  
Hussain A(2019)Synchronous estimation of state of health and remaining useful lifetime for lithium-ion battery using the incremental capacity and artificial neural networks J Energy Storage 26 100951-75
[4]  
Larcher D(2019)State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on gated recurrent neural network Energy 175 66-358
[5]  
Tarascon J M(2020)A data-driven coulomb counting method for state of charge calibration and estimation of lithium-ion battery Sustain Energy Technol Assess 40 100752-450
[6]  
Zhang S(2020)Research on online estimation of available capacity of lithium batteries based on daily charging data J Power Sources 451 227713-14173
[7]  
Zhai B(2020)Data-driven state of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery packs based on Gaussian process regression Energy 205 118000-990
[8]  
Guo X(2005)Support vector based battery state of charge estimator J Power Sources 141 351-55
[9]  
Yang F(2020)Machine learning assisted materials design and discovery for rechargeable batteries Energy Storage Mater 31 434-320
[10]  
Li W(2020)Multi-objective decision analysis for data-driven based estimation of battery states: A case study of remaining useful life estimation Int J Hydrogen Energy 45 14156-367