Agri-Environmental Policy Measures in Israel: The Potential of Using Market-Oriented Instruments

被引:0
作者
Liron Amdur
Elke Bertke
Jan Freese
Rainer Marggraf
机构
[1] University of Göttingen,Section for Environmental and Resource Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development
来源
Environmental Management | 2011年 / 47卷
关键词
Agri-environmental policy; Agri-environmental schemes; Market-orientation; Result-orientation; Conservation auctions; Institutional feasibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the possibilities of developing agri-environmental policy measures in Israel, focusing on market-oriented instruments. A conceptual framework for developing agri-environmental policy measures is presented, first in very broad lines (mandatory regulations, economic instruments and advisory measures) and subsequently focusing on economic instruments, and specifically, on market-oriented ones. Two criteria of choice between the measures are suggested: their contribution to improving the effectiveness of the policy; and the feasibility of their implementation. This is the framework used for analyzing agri-environmental measures in Israel. Israel currently implements a mix of mandatory regulations, economic instruments and advisory measures to promote the agri-environment. The use of additional economic instruments may improve the effectiveness of the policy. When comparing the effectiveness of various economic measures, we found that the feasibility of implementation of market-oriented instruments is greater, due to the Israeli public’s preference for strengthening market orientation in the agricultural sector. Four market-oriented instruments were practiced in a pilot project conducted in an Israeli rural area. We found that in this case study, the institutional feasibility and acceptance by stakeholders were the major parameters influencing the implementation of the market-oriented instruments, whereas the instruments’ contribution to enhancing the ecological or economic effectiveness were hardly considered by the stakeholders as arguments in favor of their use.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 875
页数:16
相关论文
共 124 条
  • [1] Bauer S(2006)Back to principles: Dezentralisierung und Neuausrichtung der ländlichen Regionalpolitik Agrarwirtschaft 55 137-141
  • [2] Baylis K(2008)Payment for environmental services: a comparison of US and EU agri-environmental policies Ecological Economics 65 753-764
  • [3] Peplow S(1999)Vereinfachte Ansprache von Extensivgrünland mittels Indikatorpflanzen Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung 40 34-37
  • [4] Rausser G(2000)Ansprache und Foerderung von Extensive-Gruenland Neue Wege zum Prinzip der Honorierung oekologischer Leistungen der Landwirtscheft in Baden-Wuerttember Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 32 171-175
  • [5] Simon L(2004)Agri-environmental stewardship schemes and “multifunctionality” Review of Agricultural Economics 26 220-237
  • [6] Briemle G(1996)Israel’s citrus grove landscape—an opportunity to balance urbanization with cultural values Landscape and Urban Planning 36 183-196
  • [7] Briemle G(2008)Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues Ecological Economics 65 663-674
  • [8] Dobbs TL(1999)Social norms, rationales and policies: reframing farmland protection in Israel Journal of Rural Studies 15 431-446
  • [9] Pretty JN(2008)Asymmetric information and contract design for payment for environmental services Ecological Economics 65 810-821
  • [10] Egoz S(2003)Towards multifunctional agriculture—weeds as ecological goods? Weed Research 43 227-235