Machine learning based on computational fluid dynamics enables geometric design optimisation of the NeoVAD blades

被引:0
作者
Lee Nissim
Shweta Karnik
P. Alex Smith
Yaxin Wang
O. Howard Frazier
Katharine H. Fraser
机构
[1] University of Bath,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Texas Heart Institute,Innovative Device and Engineering Applications (IDEA) Lab
[3] University of Bath,Centre for Therapeutic Innovation
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The NeoVAD is a proposed paediatric axial-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD), small enough to be implanted in infants. The design of the impeller and diffuser blades is important for hydrodynamic performance and haemocompatibility of the pump. This study aimed to optimise the blades for pump efficiency using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), machine learning and global optimisation. Meshing of each design typically included 6 million hexahedral elements and a Shear Stress Transport turbulence model was used to close the Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes equations. CFD models of 32 base geometries, operating at 8 flow rates between 0.5 and 4 L/min, were created to match experimental studies. These were validated by comparison of the pressure-flow and efficiency-flow curves with those experimentally measured for all base prototype pumps. A surrogate model was required to allow the optimisation routine to conduct an efficient search; a multi-linear regression, Gaussian Process Regression and a Bayesian Regularised Artificial Neural Network predicted the optimisation objective at design points not explicitly simulated. A Genetic Algorithm was used to search for an optimal design. The optimised design offered a 5.51% increase in efficiency at design point (a 20.9% performance increase) as compared to the best performing pump from the 32 base designs. An optimisation method for the blade design of LVADs has been shown to work for a single objective function and future work will consider multi-objective optimisation.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Rossano JW(2016)Outcomes of pediatric patients supported with continuous-flow ventricular assist devices: A report from the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (PediMACS) J. Heart Lung Transplant. 35 585-590
[2]  
Colvin M(2020)OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual data report: Heart Am. J. Transplant. 20 340-426
[3]  
Burki S(2017)Pediatric ventricular assist devices: Current challenges and future prospects Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 13 177-185
[4]  
Adachi I(2013)Berlin heart EXCOR pediatric ventricular assist device for bridge to heart transplantation in us children Circulation 127 1702-1711
[5]  
Almond CS(2015)Delineating survival outcomes in children JACC Heart Fail. 3 70-77
[6]  
Conway J(2022)10 kg bridged to transplant or recovery with the berlin heart EXCOR ventricular assist device Heart Fail. Rev. 35 603-609
[7]  
George A (2019)Complications in children with ventricular assist devices: Systematic review and meta-analyses J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 42 1028-1034
[8]  
Hsia T-Y(2016)An in-vitro analysis of the PediMag J. Heart Lung Transplant. 38 385-393
[9]  
Schievano S(2020) and CentriMag J. Heart Lung Transplant. 58 401-418
[10]  
Bozkurt S(2018) for right-sided failing Fontan support Artif. Organs 134 1-9