Safety and efficacy of adjunctive intranasal mitomycin C and triamcinolone in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

被引:0
作者
Emmy Y. Li
Andy C. Cheng
Alex C. Wong
Amy M. Sze
Hunter K. Yuen
机构
[1] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University Eye Center, 3/F, Hong Kong Eye Hospital
来源
International Ophthalmology | 2016年 / 36卷
关键词
Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy; Nasolacrimal duct obstruction; Mitomycin C; Triamcinolone;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the common causes of failure in dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is mucosal scarring and fibrosis around the ostium. Steroid and mitomycin C (MMC) can potentially reduce scarring by their action on the inflammatory and proliferative phase of wound healing, respectively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined usage of adjunctive MMC and intranasal triamcinolone (TA) in endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EE-DCR). This is a retrospective interventional case series. All patients underwent mechanical EE-DCR in two regional hospitals in Hong Kong from January 2005 to December 2006 were included. All received intraoperative MMC application for 5 min and gelfoam soaked with TA onto the ostium. Main outcome measures include the anatomical and functional success rate at follow-up at least 6 months after operation. Other outcomes include complications occurred during and after operation. A total of 73 EE-DCR were performed in 69 patients. Three patients had simultaneous bilateral DCR; one had sequential DCRs for both sides. At the last follow-up, anatomical success was achieved in 68 cases (93 %) and both anatomical with functional success in 67 cases (92 %). No major complication was observed. Minor complications included asymptomatic mucosal adhesion between the nasal septum and lateral nasal wall in one patient and moderate secondary hemorrhage in another. EE-DCR with adjunctive MMC and TA is a safe and successful procedure for the treatment of NLDO.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:5
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Lee DW(2010)Primary external dacryocystorhinostomy versus primary endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a review Clin Exp Ophthalmol 38 418-426
[2]  
Chai CH(1998)Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy Ophthalmology 105 1106-1113
[3]  
Loon SC(2002)Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser Ophthalmology 109 1575-1582
[4]  
Hartikainen J(2003)Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy Ophthalmology 110 78-84
[5]  
Grenman R(2005)External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center Ophthalmology 112 1463-1468
[6]  
Puukka P(2013)Current preferences and reported success rates in dacryocystorhinostomy amongst ASOPRS members Orbit 32 20-26
[7]  
Seppa H(2003)Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps Br J Ophthalmol 87 43-47
[8]  
Moore WM(2010)Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a modified technique with preservation of the nasal and lacrimal mucosa Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 26 161-164
[9]  
Bentley CR(1998)Adjunctive use of mitomycin C on endoscopic lacrimal surgery Br J Ophthalmol 82 63-66
[10]  
Olver JM(2012)Significance of adjunctive mitomycin C in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy Am J Otolaryngol 33 47-50