Technagogy-enhanced continuing professional development (CPD) for health professionals: design and evaluation

被引:0
作者
Irvin L. Ong
Michael Joseph S. Diño
Marcela J. Leus
Maria Minerva P. Calimag
Fe A. Hidalgo
机构
[1] The Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila
[2] Research Development and Innovation Center, Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela
[3] Phi Gamma Chapter, Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, Indianapolis
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 1卷 / 4期
关键词
Continuing professional development; Curriculum development; Educational technology; Program evaluation; Technagogy;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-021-00095-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to the changing needs and technological advancement in the twenty-first century, “technagogy” or the arts and science of teaching with technology has emerged as an underexplored opportunity in the continuing professional development (CPD). However, little is known on how to develop and evaluate a technagogy-enhanced CPD for health professionals. A mixed-methods study was utilized to generate well-grounded curriculum and evaluation frameworks that integrate technagogy and outcomes-based teaching and learning in CPD. The CPD evaluation of the implemented learning program revealed that a technagogy-enhanced CPD could lead to excellent and effective written, supported, taught, tested, and learned curriculum aspects. The designed frameworks can guide the theory, practice, research, and policy of CPD program development and evaluation. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Abma T.A., Responsive evaluation: its meaning and special contribution to health promotion, Eval Program Plann, 28, 3, pp. 279-289, (2005)
[2]  
Guidance on continuing professional development (CPD) for the Profession of Pharmacy, Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, (2015)
[3]  
Ahmed S., Parsons D., Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom, Comput Educ, 63, pp. 62-72, (2013)
[4]  
Balmer J.T., The transformation of continuing medical education (CME) in the United States, Adv Med Educ Pract, (2013)
[5]  
Barr H., Low H., Introducing Interprofessional Education, (2013)
[6]  
Bharvad A., Curriculum evaluation, Int Res J, 1, 12, pp. 72-74, (2010)
[7]  
Biggs J.B., Tang C.S., Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 3Rd Ed, (2007)
[8]  
Biggs J.B., Tang C.S., Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (2011)
[9]  
Borgia E., The Internet of Things vision: key features, applications and open issues, Comput Commun, 54, pp. 1-31, (2014)
[10]  
Bottenberg M.M., DeWitt J.E., Wall G.C., Fornoff A., Stelter N., Soltis D., Eastman D.K., Assessment of interprofessional perceptions and attitudes of health professional students in a simulation laboratory setting, Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 5, 3, pp. 167-174, (2013)