A study of heuristic guesses for adiabatic quantum computation

被引:0
作者
Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz
Salvador E. Venegas-Andraca
Alán Aspuru-Guzik
机构
[1] Harvard University,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology
[2] Tecnológico de Monterrey Campus Estado de México,Quantum Information Processing Group
来源
Quantum Information Processing | 2011年 / 10卷
关键词
Heuristic algorithms; Adiabatic quantum computation; Adiabatic preparation; Quantum algorithms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adiabatic quantum computation (AQC) is a universal model for quantum computation which seeks to transform the initial ground state of a quantum system into a final ground state encoding the answer to a computational problem. AQC initial Hamiltonians conventionally have a uniform superposition as ground state. We diverge from this practice by introducing a simple form of heuristics: the ability to start the quantum evolution with a state which is a guess to the solution of the problem. With this goal in mind, we explain the viability of this approach and the needed modifications to the conventional AQC (CAQC) algorithm. By performing a numerical study on hard-to-satisfy 6 and 7 bit random instances of the satisfiability problem (3-SAT), we show how this heuristic approach is possible and we identify that the performance of the particular algorithm proposed is largely determined by the Hamming distance of the chosen initial guess state with respect to the solution. Besides the possibility of introducing educated guesses as initial states, the new strategy allows for the possibility of restarting a failed adiabatic process from the measured excited state as opposed to restarting from the full superposition of states as in CAQC. The outcome of the measurement can be used as a more refined guess state to restart the adiabatic evolution. This concatenated restart process is another heuristic that the CAQC strategy cannot capture.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 52
页数:19
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Childs A.M.(2001)Robustness of adiabatic quantum computation Phys. Rev. A 65 012322-475
[2]  
Farhi E.(2008)Towards fault tolerant adiabatic quantum computation Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 160506-516
[3]  
Preskill J.(2001)A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an NP-complete problem Science 292 472-1707
[4]  
Lidar D.A.(2003)Adiabatic quantum computing for random satisfiability problems Phys. Rev. A 67 022314-5393
[5]  
Farhi E.(2008)Size dependence of the minimum excitation gap in the quantum adiabatic algorithm Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 170503-931
[6]  
Goldstone J.(2008)Construction of model Hamiltonians for adiabatic quantum computation and its application to finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models Phys. Rev. A 78 012320-35
[7]  
Gutmann S.(2009)Quantum adiabatic brachistochrone Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 080502-815
[8]  
Lapan J.(2008)How to make the quantum adiabatic algorithm fail Int. J. Quantum Inf. 06 503-764
[9]  
Lundgren A.(2002)Quantum search by local adiabatic evolution Phys. Rev. A 65 042308-1524
[10]  
Preda D.(2006)Exponential complexity of an adiabatic algorithm for an NP-complete problem Phys. Rev. A 73 022329-1097