Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups

被引：0
作者：
Jamie J Kirkham
Elizabeth Gargon
Mike Clarke
Paula R Williamson
机构：
[1] University of Liverpool,Department of Biostatistics
[2] Queen’s University Belfast,Centre for Public Health
[3] Royal Victoria Hospital,undefined
来源：
Trials | / 14卷
关键词：
COMET; Cochrane review groups; Co-ordinating editors; Core outcome set; ORBIT; Systematic reviews; Survey;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Dwan K(2008)Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias PLoS One 3 e3081-2
  • [2] Altman DG(2010)The impact of outcome reporting bias on systematic reviews BMJ 340 c365-626
  • [3] Arnaiz JA(2007)Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews Trials 8 39-undefined
  • [4] Bloom J(2012)Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes J Health Serv Res Policy 17 1-undefined
  • [5] Chan A-W(2010)Summary of findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information J Clin Epidemiol 63 620-undefined
  • [6] Cronin E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [7] Decullier E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [8] Easterbrook PJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Von Elm E(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Gamble C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
123