Recovery of the motor function of the arm with the aid of a hand exoskeleton controlled by a brain–computer interface in a patient with an extensive brain lesion

被引：9

作者：

Biryukova E.V. ^{[1
,2
]}

Pavlova O.G. ^{[1
]}

Kurganskaya M.E. ^{[1
]}

Bobrov P.D. ^{[1
]}

Turbina L.G. ^{[3
]}

Frolov A.A. ^{[1
,2
,4
]}

Davydov V.I. ^{[1
]}

Silchenko A.V. ^{[1
,5
]}

Mokienko O.A. ^{[6
]}

机构：

[1] Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

[2] Pirogov National Medical Research University, Moscow

[3] Vladimirskii Regional Clinical Research Institute, Moscow

[4] Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava

[5] Moscow State University, Moscow

[6] Center of Neurology Research, Moscow

来源：

Human Physiology | 2016年 / 42卷 / 1期

关键词：

assessment of motor function; biomechanical analysis of movement; brain–computer interface; neurorehabilitation;

D O I：

10.1134/S0362119716010035

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The dynamics of motor function recovery in a patient with an extensive brain lesion has been investigated during a course of neurorehabilitation assisted by a hand exoskeleton controlled by a brain–computer interface. Biomechanical analysis of the movements of the paretic arm recorded during the rehabilitation course was used for an unbiased assessment of motor function. Fifteen procedures involving hand exoskeleton control (one procedure per week) yielded the following results: (a) the velocity profile for targeted movements of the paretic hand became nearly bell-shaped; (b) the patient began to extend and abduct the hand, which was flexed and adducted at the beginning of the course; and (c) the patient started supinating the forearm, which was pronated at the beginning of the rehabilitation course. The first result is interpreted as improvement of the general level of control over the paretic hand, and the two other results are interpreted as a decrease in spasticity of the paretic hand. © 2016, Pleiades Publishing, Inc.

引用

页码：13 / 23

页数：10

共 51 条

[1] Kotov S.V., Stakhovskaya L.V., Isakova E.V., in Insul’t (Stroke), Stakhovskaya, L.V. Kotov, S.V., Eds., (2014)
[2] Kubler A., Birbaumer N., Brain-computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients?, Clin. Neurophysiol., 119, 11, (2008)
[3] Millan J.R., Rupp R., Muller-Putz G.R., Et al., Combining brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies: State-of the-art and challenges, Front. Neurosci., 4, (2010)
[4] Nudo R.J., Milliken G.W., Jenkins W.M., Merzenich M.M., Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys, J. Neurosci., 16, 2, (1996)
[5] Bach-Y-Rita P., Theoretical and practical considerations in the restoration of function after stroke, Top Stroke Rehabil., 8, 3, (2001)
[6] Taub E., Uswatte G., Elbert T., New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 3, 3, (2002)
[7] Butler A.J., Page S.J., Mental practice with motor imagery: Evidence for motor recovery and cortical reorganization after stroke, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 87, 12, (2006)
[8] Sharma N., Pomeroy V.M., Baron J.C., Motor imagery: A backdoor to the motor system after stroke?, Stroke, 37, 7, (2006)
[9] Mokienko O.A., Brain-computer interface based on motor imagery during rehabilitation of patients with focal brain lesions, Cand. Sci. (Med.) Dissertation, (2013)
[10] Frolov A.A., Biryukova E.V., Bobrov P.D., Et al., Principles of neurorehabilitation based on the brain-computer interface and biologically adequate control of the exoskeleton, Hum. Physiol., 39, 2, (2013)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →