Think tank 2.0 for deliberative policy analysis

被引:0
作者
Ya Li
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Management and Economics
来源
Policy Sciences | 2015年 / 48卷
关键词
Deliberative policy analysis; Think tank 2.0; Public participation; Dispute resolution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Deliberative policy analysis (DPA) is one of the significant developments in the trend of post-positivist policy analysis. However, the question of how to practice is a thorny issue hindering its development and dissemination. More particularly, the organizational aspect for the practice of DPA has never been well explored. Taking an organizational perspective, this article proposes a novel concept of “think tank 2.0” (TT2.0), which is designed to host deliberative analysts and to integrate the policy inquiry with public participation, deliberation, and dispute resolution. The article begins with a hypothetical example to showcase what DPA means and how it works. The following section presents a brief review of the principles of DPA, and a call for developing DPA institutes on account of the complexity of conducting deliberative analysis. Next, the article brings the conceptual framework of TT2.0 and its two models: an external model describing the relations among TT2.0 and other policy actors and an internal model structuring the roles within a TT2.0 and their division of labor. Finally, the article discusses some varieties of TT2.0 in operation and suggests several strategies for devising and operating TT2.0.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 50
页数:25
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Ansell C(2008)Collaborative governance in theory and practice Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 543-571
[2]  
Gash A(2011)The policy sciences of social media Policy Studies Journal 39 709-736
[3]  
Auer MR(2014)Uses of evidence in local cultural policy: Performance, legitimation, problem representation, and learning in two Australian municipalities Evidence & Policy 10 223-241
[4]  
Blomkamp E(2013)Designing public participation processes Public Administration Review 73 23-34
[5]  
Bryson JM(1992)The democratization of the policy sciences Public Administration Review 52 125-129
[6]  
Quick KS(1998)The evidentiary base for policy analysis: Empiricist versus postpositivist positions Policy Studies Journal 26 109-113
[7]  
Slotterback CS(1998)Models of policy discourse: Insights versus prediction Policy Studies Journal 26 147-161
[8]  
Crosby BC(2005)Deliberative democracy in different places Journal of Zhejiang University 35 32-40
[9]  
deLeon P(1993)Participatory policy analysis in a social service agency: A case study Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12 297-322
[10]  
deLeon P(1999)The transition from traditional to postpositivist policy analysis: A role for Q-methodology Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 389-410